Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34921048›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2022

Saturating Nonlinearities of Contrast Response in Human Visual Cortex.

Louis N Vinke, Ilona M Bloem, Sam Ling

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Visual adaptation stronger at the horizontal than the vertical meridian: Linking performance with V1 cortical surface area.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  6. Heterogeneous Effects of Cognitive Arousal on the Contrast Response in Human Visual Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Modeling neural contrast sensitivity functions in human visual cortex.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Louis N VinkeGraduate Program for Neuroscience, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215.
Ilona M BloemPsychological and Brain Sciences, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215.
Sam LingPsychological and Brain Sciences, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215 samling@bu.edu.
Boston University · USCity University of New York · USMassachusetts General Hospital · US

Funding

How Does Normalization Regulate Visual Competition?R01EY028163 · NEI · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI SAM LING · 2017 to 2026
$3.7M
Where orientation selectivity arises, and how it can changeF32EY019802 · NEI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI LING, SAM · 2009 to 2009
$50k
NEI NIH HHS F32 EY019802NEI NIH HHS R01 EY028163
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Response nonlinearities are ubiquitous throughout the brain, especially within sensory cortices where changes in stimulus intensity typically produce compressed responses. Although this relationship is well established in electrophysiological measurements, it remains controversial whether the same nonlinearities hold for population-based measurements obtained with human fMRI. We propose that these purported disparities are not contingent on measurement type and are instead largely dependent on the visual system state at the time of interrogation. We show that deploying a contrast adaptation paradigm permits reliable measurements of saturating sigmoidal contrast response functions (10 participants, 7 female). When not controlling the adaptation state, our results coincide with previous fMRI studies, yielding nonsaturating, largely linear contrast responses. These findings highlight the important role of adaptation in manifesting measurable nonlinear responses within human visual cortex, reconciling discrepancies reported in vision neuroscience, re-establishing the qualitative relationship between stimulus intensity and response across different neural measures and the concerted study of cortical gain control.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalAdultContrast SensitivityFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePhotic StimulationVisual Cortexadaptationdivisive normalizationfMRIgain controlvisionvisual cortex

Identifiers

PMID34921048
PMCPMC8883860
OpenAlexW4200278330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.