Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34920729›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2021

Patient discharge from intensive care: an updated scoping review to identify tools and practices to inform high-quality care.

Kara M Plotnikoff, Karla D Krewulak, Laura Hernández, Krista Spence, Nadine Foster, Shelly Longmore, Sharon E Straus, Daniel J Niven, Jeanna Parsons Leigh, Henry T Stelfox and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A scoping review of global approaches to education in adult critical care retrieval.African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Making sense of the outcome of a rehabilitation implementation trial in the intensive care unit: Mixed methods.The Southern African journal of critical care : the official journal of the Critical Care Society · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Spatial equity and factors associated with intensive care unit bed allocation in China.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Kara M PlotnikoffDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary and Alberta Health Services, 3134 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 4Z6, Canada.
Karla D KrewulakDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary and Alberta Health Services, 3134 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 4Z6, Canada.
Laura HernándezDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary and Alberta Health Services, 3134 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 4Z6, Canada.
Krista SpenceDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary and Alberta Health Services, 3134 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 4Z6, Canada.
Nadine FosterDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary and Alberta Health Services, 3134 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 4Z6, Canada.
Shelly LongmoreDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary and Alberta Health Services, 3134 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 4Z6, Canada.
Sharon E StrausKnowledge Translation Program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, 209 Victoria Street, East Building, Toronto, ON, M5B 1W8, Canada.
Daniel J NivenDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary and Alberta Health Services, 3134 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 4Z6, Canada.
Jeanna Parsons LeighDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary and Alberta Health Services, 3134 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 4Z6, Canada.
Henry T StelfoxDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary and Alberta Health Services, 3134 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 4Z6, Canada.
Kirsten M FiestDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary and Alberta Health Services, 3134 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 4Z6, Canada. kmfiest@ucalgary.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-7299-6594
Alberta Health Services · CASt. Michael's Hospital · CA

Funding

CIHR Transitions in Care 423947
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCritically ill patients require complex care and experience unique needs during and after their stay in the intensive care unit (ICU). Discharging or transferring a patient from the ICU to a hospital ward or back to community care (under the care of a general practitioner) includes several elements that may shape patient outcomes and overall experiences. The aim of this study was to answer the question: what elements facilitate a successful, high-quality discharge from the ICU?

methodsThis scoping review is an update to a review published in 2015. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane databases from 2013-December 3, 2020 including adult, pediatric, and neonatal populations without language restrictions. Data were abstracted using different phases of care framework models, themes, facilitators, and barriers to the ICU discharge process.

resultsWe included 314 articles from 11,461 unique citations. Two-hundred and fifty-eight (82.2%) articles were primary research articles, mostly cohort (118/314, 37.6%) or qualitative (51/314, 16.2%) studies. Common discharge themes across all articles included adverse events, readmission, and mortality after discharge (116/314, 36.9%) and patient and family needs and experiences during discharge (112/314, 35.7%). Common discharge facilitators were discharge education for patients and families (82, 26.1%), successful provider-provider communication (77/314, 24.5%), and organizational tools to facilitate discharge (50/314, 15.9%). Barriers to a successful discharge included patient demographic and clinical characteristics (89/314, 22.3%), healthcare provider workload (21/314, 6.7%), and the impact of current discharge practices on flow and performance (49/314, 15.6%). We identified 47 discharge tools that could be used or adapted to facilitate an ICU discharge.

conclusionsSeveral factors contribute to a successful ICU discharge, with facilitators and barriers present at the patient and family, health care provider, and organizational level. Successful provider-patient and provider-provider communication, and educating and engaging patients and families about the discharge process were important factors in a successful ICU discharge.

Indexed as

Critical CarePatient DischargeAdultChildCritical IllnessHumansInfant, NewbornIntensive Care UnitsQuality of Health CareCritical careIntensive carePatient dischargeQuality of careTransitions in care

Identifiers

PMID34920729
PMCPMC8684123
OpenAlexW4200552282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.