Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34920708›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2021

Combining word embeddings to extract chemical and drug entities in biomedical literature.

Pilar López-Úbeda, Manuel Carlos Díaz-Galiano, L Alfonso Ureña-López, M Teresa Martín-Valdivia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Pilar López-ÚbedaDepartment of Computer Science, Advanced Studies Center in Information and Communication Technologies (CEATIC), Universidad de Jaén, Campus Las Lagunillas s/n, 23071, Jaén, Spain. plubeda@ujaen.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0478-743X
Manuel Carlos Díaz-GalianoDepartment of Computer Science, Advanced Studies Center in Information and Communication Technologies (CEATIC), Universidad de Jaén, Campus Las Lagunillas s/n, 23071, Jaén, Spain.
L Alfonso Ureña-LópezDepartment of Computer Science, Advanced Studies Center in Information and Communication Technologies (CEATIC), Universidad de Jaén, Campus Las Lagunillas s/n, 23071, Jaén, Spain.
M Teresa Martín-ValdiviaDepartment of Computer Science, Advanced Studies Center in Information and Communication Technologies (CEATIC), Universidad de Jaén, Campus Las Lagunillas s/n, 23071, Jaén, Spain.

Funding

Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional RTI2018-094653-B-C21
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNatural language processing (NLP) and text mining technologies for the extraction and indexing of chemical and drug entities are key to improving the access and integration of information from unstructured data such as biomedical literature.

methodsIn this paper we evaluate two important tasks in NLP: the named entity recognition (NER) and Entity indexing using the SNOMED-CT terminology. For this purpose, we propose a combination of word embeddings in order to improve the results obtained in the PharmaCoNER challenge.

resultsFor the NER task we present a neural network composed of BiLSTM with a CRF sequential layer where different word embeddings are combined as an input to the architecture. A hybrid method combining supervised and unsupervised models is used for the concept indexing task. In the supervised model, we use the training set to find previously trained concepts, and the unsupervised model is based on a 6-step architecture. This architecture uses a dictionary of synonyms and the Levenshtein distance to assign the correct SNOMED-CT code.

conclusionOn the one hand, the combination of word embeddings helps to improve the recognition of chemicals and drugs in the biomedical literature. We achieved results of 91.41% for precision, 90.14% for recall, and 90.77% for F1-score using micro-averaging. On the other hand, our indexing system achieves a 92.67% F1-score, 92.44% for recall, and 92.91% for precision. With these results in a final ranking, we would be in the first position.

Indexed as

Information Storage and RetrievalMedical InformaticsPharmaceutical PreparationsSemanticsUnified Medical Language SystemPharmaceutical PreparationsConcept indexingNamed entity recognitionNatural language processingNeural networkSNOMED-CTWord embeddings

Identifiers

PMID34920708
PMCPMC8684055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.