ArticleBMC gastroenterology2021
Identification of Barrett's esophagus in endoscopic images using deep learning.
Article in BMC gastroenterology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- TNM staging of esophageal cancer using fine-tuned pathology foundation models and multiple instance learning.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Revolutionizing upper gastrointestinal disease diagnosis: The transformative role of artificial intelligence in endoscopy.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2025Review
- Deep Learning for Image Analysis in the Diagnosis and Management of Esophageal Cancer.Cancers · 2024Review
- Advancing Barrett's Esophagus Segmentation: A Deep-Learning Ensemble Approach with Data Augmentation and Model Collaboration.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Deep Learning in Barrett's Esophagus Diagnosis: Current Status and Future Directions.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Revolutionizing healthcare by use of artificial intelligence in esophageal carcinoma - a narrative review.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2023Review
- Preparing Well for Esophageal Endoscopic Detection Using a Hybrid Model and Transfer Learning.Cancers · 2023Article
- Diagnosis and Management of Barrett's Esophagus.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Role of artificial intelligence in diagnosing Barrett's esophagus-related neoplasia.Clinical endoscopy · 2023Review
- Artificial Intelligence in the Management of Barrett's Esophagus and Early Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.Cancers · 2022Review
- The investigation of construction and clinical application of image recognition technology assisted bronchoscopy diagnostic model of lung cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDevelopment of a deep learning method to identify Barrett's esophagus (BE) scopes in endoscopic images.
methods443 endoscopic images from 187 patients of BE were included in this study. The gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) and squamous-columnar junction (SCJ) of BE were manually annotated in endoscopic images by experts. Fully convolutional neural networks (FCN) were developed to automatically identify the BE scopes in endoscopic images. The networks were trained and evaluated in two separate image sets. The performance of segmentation was evaluated by intersection over union (IOU).
resultsThe deep learning method was proved to be satisfying in the automated identification of BE in endoscopic images. The values of the IOU were 0.56 (GEJ) and 0.82 (SCJ), respectively.
conclusionsDeep learning algorithm is promising with accuracies of concordance with manual human assessment in segmentation of the BE scope in endoscopic images. This automated recognition method helps clinicians to locate and recognize the scopes of BE in endoscopic examinations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.