Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34920699›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2021

Improving deep learning method for biomedical named entity recognition by using entity definition information.

Ying Xiong, Shuai Chen, Buzhou Tang, Qingcai Chen, Xiaolong Wang, Jun Yan, Yi Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ying XiongDepartment of Computer Science, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen, Shenzhen, 518055, China.
Shuai ChenDepartment of Computer Science, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen, Shenzhen, 518055, China.
Buzhou TangDepartment of Computer Science, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen, Shenzhen, 518055, China. tangbuzhou@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0271-8246
Qingcai ChenDepartment of Computer Science, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen, Shenzhen, 518055, China.
Xiaolong WangDepartment of Computer Science, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen, Shenzhen, 518055, China.
Jun YanYidu Cloud (Beijing) Technology Co., Ltd, Beijing, China.
Yi ZhouZhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China. zhouyi@sysu.edu.cn.

Funding

Guangdong Province Covid-19 Pandemic Control Research Fund 2020KZDZX1222Innovation Fund of Harbin Institute of Technology HIT.NSRIF.2017052National Natural Science Foundations of China 61573118National Natural Science Foundations of China 61876052National Natural Science Foundations of China U1813215National Natural Science Foundations of Guangdong, China 2019A1515011158Special Foundation for Technology Research Program of Guangdong Province 2015B010131010Strategic Emerging Industry Development Special Funds of Shenzhen JCYJ20170307150528934Strategic Emerging Industry Development Special Funds of Shenzhen JCYJ20180306172232154
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBiomedical named entity recognition (NER) is a fundamental task of biomedical text mining that finds the boundaries of entity mentions in biomedical text and determines their entity type. To accelerate the development of biomedical NER techniques in Spanish, the PharmaCoNER organizers launched a competition to recognize pharmacological substances, compounds, and proteins. Biomedical NER is usually recognized as a sequence labeling task, and almost all state-of-the-art sequence labeling methods ignore the meaning of different entity types. In this paper, we investigate some methods to introduce the meaning of entity types in deep learning methods for biomedical NER and apply them to the PharmaCoNER 2019 challenge. The meaning of each entity type is represented by its definition information. MATERIAL AND

methodWe investigate how to use entity definition information in the following two methods: (1) SQuad-style machine reading comprehension (MRC) methods that treat entity definition information as query and biomedical text as context and predict answer spans as entities. (2) Span-level one-pass (SOne) methods that predict entity spans of one type by one type and introduce entity type meaning, which is represented by entity definition information. All models are trained and tested on the PharmaCoNER 2019 corpus, and their performance is evaluated by strict micro-average precision, recall, and F1-score.

resultsEntity definition information brings improvements to both SQuad-style MRC and SOne methods by about 0.003 in micro-averaged F1-score. The SQuad-style MRC model using entity definition information as query achieves the best performance with a micro-averaged precision of 0.9225, a recall of 0.9050, and an F1-score of 0.9137, respectively. It outperforms the best model of the PharmaCoNER 2019 challenge by 0.0032 in F1-score. Compared with the state-of-the-art model without using manually-crafted features, our model obtains a 1% improvement in F1-score, which is significant. These results indicate that entity definition information is useful for deep learning methods on biomedical NER.

conclusionOur entity definition information enhanced models achieve the state-of-the-art micro-average F1 score of 0.9137, which implies that entity definition information has a positive impact on biomedical NER detection. In the future, we will explore more entity definition information from knowledge graph.

Indexed as

Deep LearningBiomedical named entity recognitionEntity definition informationMachine reading comprehensionSpan-level one-pass method

Identifiers

PMID34920699
PMCPMC8680061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.