Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34920036›Full record

ArticleJournal of affective disorders2022

Risk factors of psychological distress during the COVID-19 pandemic: The roles of coping style and emotional regulation.

Na Li, Lurong Fan, Yan Wang, Jing Wang, Yu Huang

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of affective disorders, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Psychological Distress in Emergency Department Nurses at Women's and Children's Hospitals During the COVID-19 Epidemic: A Cross-Sectional Study.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Na LiMental Health Education Center, Chengdu Normal University, Chengdu 611130, PR China.
Lurong FanBusiness School, Sichuan University, No. 24, South Section 1, Yihuan Road, Chengdu, Sichuan 610064, PR China; Institute of Emergency Management and Reconstruction in Post-disaster, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610064, PR China. Electronic address: fanlurong@scu.edu.cn.
Yan WangBusiness School, Sichuan University, No. 24, South Section 1, Yihuan Road, Chengdu, Sichuan 610064, PR China; Institute of Emergency Management and Reconstruction in Post-disaster, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610064, PR China.
Jing WangMental Health Education Center, Chengdu Normal University, Chengdu 611130, PR China.
Yu HuangMental Health Education Center, Chengdu Normal University, Chengdu 611130, PR China.
Chengdu Normal University · CNSichuan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhen COVID-19 emerged in China in late 2019, most citizens were home-quarantined to prevent the spread of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Extended periods of isolation have detrimental effects on an individual's mental health. Therefore, the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic should include assessment of psychological distress and its known risk factors, including coping style and emotional regulation.

methodsThis cross-sectional study surveyed 6,027 Chinese university students recruited from May 25, 2020 to June 10, 2020. In addition to sociodemographic information, participant data were collected using online versions of the 10-item Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10), Simplified Coping Style Questionnaire (SCSQ), and Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ).

resultsThe incidence of psychological distress was found to be 35.34%. Negative coping style and expressing panic about COVID-19 on social media were the most important predictors of psychological distress. In addition, being male, being a "left-behind child" or having a monthly household income lower than 5000 CNY or higher than 20,000 CNY were associated with higher psychological distress.

conclusionThe psychological consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic could be serious. Psychological interventions that reduce nervousness and negative coping style need to be made available to home-quarantined university students, especially those who are male, are "left-behind", have a monthly household income lower than 5000 CNY or higher than 20,000 CNY, or express panic on social media.

Indexed as

COVID-19Emotional RegulationPsychological DistressAdaptation, PsychologicalChildCross-Sectional StudiesHumansMalePandemicsRisk FactorsSARS-CoV-2Surveys and QuestionnairesCoping styleCOVID-19 pandemicEmotional regulationPsychological distressUniversity students

Identifiers

PMID34920036
PMCPMC8683097
OpenAlexW4200039928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.