Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34919856›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet. Global health2022

Global return on investment and cost-effectiveness of WHO's HEAR interventions for hearing loss: a modelling study.

David Tordrup, Robert Smith, Kaloyan Kamenov, Melanie Y Bertram, Nathan Green, Shelly Chadha, WHO HEAR group

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet. Global health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Sensory integration, postural stability, and quality of life: a multidimensional assessment in adult hearing aid users.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  4. Annual noise exposure among Malaysian young adults.Environmental epidemiology (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2026
    Article
  5. Functionalized Biomimetic Scaffolds for Human-Derived Auditory Neural Circuit Construction.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The cost-effectiveness of unilateral cochlear implantation in the Finnish health care.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Auditory Spatial Perception as a Function of Recreational Noise Exposure in Gen-Z Adults with Normal Hearing.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

David TordrupWHO Collaborating Centre for Pharmaceutical Policy and Regulation, Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands; Triangulate Health, Doncaster, UK. Electronic address: dtordrup@gmail.com.
Robert SmithSchool of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Kaloyan KamenovWHO Sensory Functions, Disability, and Rehabilitation Unit, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Melanie Y BertramDepartment of Health Systems Governance and Financing, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Nathan GreenDepartment of Statistical Science, University College London, London, UK.
Shelly ChadhaWHO Sensory Functions, Disability, and Rehabilitation Unit, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
WHO HEAR group
World Health Organization · CHUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Sheffield · GB

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo address the growing prevalence of hearing loss, WHO has identified a compendium of key evidence-based ear and hearing care interventions to be included within countries' universal health coverage packages. To assess the cost-effectiveness of these interventions and their budgetary effect for countries, we aimed to analyse the investment required to scale up services from baseline to recommended levels, and the return to society for every US$1 invested in the compendium.

methodsWe did a modelling study using the proposed set of WHO interventions (summarised under the acronym HEAR: hearing screening and intervention for newborn babies and infants, pre-school and school-age children, older adults, and adults at higher risk of hearing loss; ear disease prevention and management; access to technologies such as hearing aids, cochlear implants, or hearing assistive technologies; and rehabilitation service provision), which span the life course and include screening and management of hearing loss and related ear diseases, costs and benefits for the national population cohorts of 172 countries. The return on investment was analysed for the period between 2020 and 2030 using three scenarios: a business-as-usual scenario, a progress scenario with a scale-up to 50% of recommended coverage, and an ambitious scenario with scale-up to 90% of recommended coverage. Using data for hearing loss burden from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019, a transition model with three states (general population, diagnosed, and those who have died) was developed to model the national populations in countries. For the return-on-investment analysis, the monetary value of disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) averted in addition to productivity gains were compared against the investment required in each scenario.

findingsScaling up ear and hearing care interventions to 90% requires an overall global investment of US$238·8 billion over 10 years. Over a 10-year period, this investment promises substantial health gains with more than 130 million DALYs averted. These gains translate to a monetary value of more than US$1·3 trillion. In addition, investment in hearing care will result in productivity benefits of more than US$2 trillion at the global level by 2030. Together, these benefits correspond to a return of nearly US$15 for every US$1 invested.

interpretationThis is the first-ever global investment case for integrating ear and hearing care interventions in countries' universal health coverage services. The findings show the economic benefits of investing in this compendium and provide the basis for facilitating the increase of country's health budget for strengthening ear and hearing care services.

fundingNone.

Indexed as

Universal Health CareCost-Benefit AnalysisDeveloping CountriesEar DiseasesHealth Services AccessibilityHearing AidsHearing LossHumansMass ScreeningModels, EconometricWorld Health Organization

Identifiers

PMID34919856
PMCPMC8692586
OpenAlexW4200030573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.