ArticleJournal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH2022
Targeted proteomics for evaluating risk of venous thrombosis following traumatic lower-leg injury or knee arthroscopy.
Article in Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Distinct plasma protein profiles after long-term remission of Cushing's disease.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2026Article
- Distinct changes in plasma protein profiles of cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors versus chemotherapy: implications for thrombosis risk and adverse outcomes.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2026Article
- Lipid metabolism, microglia, and stroke.Neural regeneration research · 2026Article
- Proteomic Biomarkers in VTE: From Discovery to Clinical Translation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Quantitative targeted proteomics for occult cancer screening in patients with unprovoked venous thromboembolism: results from the prospective PLATO-VTE study.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2025Article
- Novel tissue biomarker candidates to predict both deep venous thrombosis and healing outcome after Achilles tendon rupture.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Exploration of the plasma proteomic profile of patients at risk of thromboembolic events.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2025Article
- An early warning indicator of mortality risk in patients with COVID-19: the neutrophil extracellular traps/neutrophilic segmented granulocyte ratio.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
- Combination of HBA1, TTR, and SERPINF2 in plasma defines phenotype correlated with severe burn outcome.iScience · 2023Article
- Targeted proteomics for evaluating risk of venous thrombosis following traumatic lower-leg injury or knee arthroscopy.Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPatients with lower-leg cast immobilization and patients undergoing knee arthroscopy have an increased risk of venous thrombosis (VT). Guidelines are ambiguous about thromboprophylaxis use, and individual risk factors for developing VT are often ignored. To assist in VT risk stratification and guide thromboprophylaxis use, various prediction models have been developed. These models depend largely on clinical factors and provide reasonably good C-statistics of around 70%. We explored using protein levels in blood plasma measured by multiplexed quantitative targeted proteomics to predict VT. Our aim was to assess whether a VT risk prediction model based on absolute plasma protein quantification is possible.
methodsWe used internal standards to quantify proteins in less than 10 μl plasma. We measured 270 proteins in samples from patients scheduled for knee arthroscopy or with lower-leg cast immobilization. The two prospective POT-(K)CAST trails allow complementary views of VT signature in blood, namely pre and post trauma, respectively. From approximately 3000 patients, 31 patients developed VT who were included and matched with double the number of controls.
resultsTop discriminating proteins between cases and controls included APOC3, APOC4, APOC2, ATRN, F13B, and F2 in knee arthroscopy patients and APOE, SERPINF2, B2M, F13B, AFM, and C1QC in patients with lower-leg cast. A logistic regression model with cross-validation resulted in C-statistics of 88.1% (95% CI: 85.7-90.6%) and 79.6% (95% CI: 77.2-82.0%) for knee arthroscopy and cast immobilization groups respectively.
conclusionsPromising C-statistics merit further exploration of the value of proteomic tests for predicting VT risk upon additional validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.