ArticleThe British journal of radiology2022
MRI for paediatric flatfoot: is it necessary?
Article in The British journal of radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo determine the additional benefit of MRI for children with flatfoot deformity assessed with weight-bearing radiographs in a specialist paediatric orthopaedic unit. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patient cohort was obtained by searching the Radiology Information System for children referred for investigation of flatfoot. All patients with flatfoot on weight-bearing radiographs who had undergone MRI were included. Radiographs were classified by a consultant musculoskeletal radiologist as showing no underlying abnormality, talo-calcaneal coalition, calcaneonavicular coalition, accessory navicular or other abnormality. MRI studies were classified similarly by a different consultant musculoskeletal radiologist blinded to the radiographic findings.
results33 males and 24 females were included (mean age 12.5 years; range 3-18 years). 24 had bilateral abnormality, so 81 feet were assessed. Radiographs showed no specific abnormality (
conclusionMRI is a valuable adjunct to weight-bearing radiography for investigating paediatric flatfoot deformity. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: MRI is of value in the assessment of paediatric flatfoot, additional diagnostic information to radiography being identified in 23.5% cases, while in 60.8% of cases for which radiographs provided no specific diagnosis MRI confirmed no underlying abnormality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.