ArticleThe British journal of radiology2022
The role of
Article in The British journal of radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ocular adnexal lymphomas: A comprehensive review with emphasis on histopathologic and magnetic resonance imaging appearance.Histology and histopathology · 2026Review
- Non-gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphomas: a narrative review of pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment strategies.Annals of translational medicine · 2025Review
- Clinical Patterns and Prognostic Outcomes of Asian Ocular Adnexal Marginal Zone Lymphoma.Journal of hematology · 2025Article
- Clinical and imaging features of primary thyroid MALT lymphoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- MRI-based long-term follow-up of indolent orbital lymphomas after curative radiotherapy: imaging remission criteria and volumetric regression kinetics.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Non‑Hodgkin's lymphomas of the lacrimal sac: Current insights and future directions (Review).Medicine internationalReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe purpose of this study is to evaluate the value of fluorine-18-fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (
methods70 patients with OAML who received radiotherapy were recruited in our study. All the patients had the
resultsThe PET/CT scan indicated that 80% (56/70) of the patients showed orbital FDG avidity. The median level of maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of the lesions was 4.65 ± 3.00 (range:1.2-13.5). 92.0% (46/50) of the mass-forming lesions showed
conclusionADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: The value of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.