Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34919212›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique2022

"I may be essential but someone has to look after my kids": women physicians and COVID-19.

Julia Smith, Lina Abouzaid, Joy Masuhara, Salima Noormohamed, Neli Remo, Lynn Straatman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Nurses Navigating Mental Health During Uncharted Times: Self, Others, Systems (S.O.S)!The Canadian journal of nursing research = Revue canadienne de recherche en sciences infirmieres · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Julia SmithFaculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, 11806 Blusson Hall, 8888 University Dr., Burnaby, BC, V5A 1S6, Canada. jhs6@sfu.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5175-1109
Lina AbouzaidVancouver Physician Staff Association, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Joy MasuharaDepartment of Family Practice, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Salima NoormohamedPhysician Engagement & Program Development, Vancouver Coastal Health, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Neli RemoPhysician Engagement, Vancouver Coastal Health, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Lynn StraatmanDivision of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

Funding

Institute of Gender and Health OV7-170639
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis paper analyzes results from focus groups held with women physicians in British Columbia which explored questions around how gender norms and roles influenced their experiences during COVID-19.

methodsFour virtual focus groups were organized between July and September 2020. Participants (n = 27) were voluntarily recruited. Data were analyzed using applied thematic analysis.

resultsIn addition to the COVID-19-related changes experienced across the profession, women physicians faced distinct challenges related to an increase in unpaid care responsibilities, and often felt excluded from, and occasionally dismissed by, leadership. Women leaders often felt their contributions were unrecognized and undervalued. Participants drew strength from other women leaders, peer networks, and professional support, but these strategies were limited by unpaid care and emotional labour demands, which were identified as increasing risk of burnout. DISCUSSION: Even though women physicians hold a degree of relative privilege, unpaid care work and gender norms contribute to distinct secondary effects of COVID-19. Women physicians link these to pre-pandemic assumptions (within families and communities) that women would absorb care deficits at their own cost. Health system leadership continues to reflect a masculine normative experience wherein the personal and professional are separated, and which devalues the emotional labour often associated with feminine leadership. The strategies participants employed to address negative impacts, while demonstrating resourcefulness and peer support, reflect individualistic responses to social-structural challenges. There is a need for greater recognition of women's contributions at home and work, increased representation in decision-making, and practical supports such as childcare and counselling.

Indexed as

COVID-19Physicians, WomenBritish ColumbiaFemaleHumansLeadershipSARS-CoV-2COVID-19GenderHealth systemsLeadershipPhysiciansWomen

Identifiers

PMID34919212
PMCPMC8678972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.