ReviewThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2022
The association between heart rate reserve and impaired coronary flow velocity reserve: a study based on adenosine stress echocardiography.
Review in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Heart Failure in Type 1 vs. Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Shared Pathways, Distinct Challenges.Journal of diabetes research · 2026Review
- Metabolic Modulation in Dilated Cardiomyopathy: From Pathophysiology to Therapy.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- Impaired Coronary Microcirculation and Myocardial Systolic Function: A Narrative Review on Non-Invasive Assessment in Cardiovascular Diseases.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Incremental value of non-invasive myocardial work for the evaluation and prediction of coronary microvascular dysfunction in angina with no obstructive coronary artery disease.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study was to explore the correlation between heart rate reserve (HRR) to coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR), using adenosine stress echocardiography (SE), in patients with angina and no obstructive coronary artery disease (ANOCA). 111 ANOCA patients underwent adenosine SE were enrolled, which were divided into two groups, impaired CFVR group (CFVR < 2) and control groups (CFVR ≥ 2). The relationships between HRR and impaired CFVR were explored in total and subgroup to sex. A reduced HRR during adenosine infusion was seen in ANOCA patients with impaired CFVR (25.73 ± 8.39 vs. 34.30 ± 19.93, P < 0.001). Compared to respective controls, the blunted HRR to adenosine was more pronounced in female patients (women: 27.21 ± 8.01 vs. 39.48 ± 10.57, P < 0.001; men: 24.05 ± 8.70 vs. 29.12 ± 8.69, P = 0.041). A strong association between CFVR and a blunted HRR was observed in women (r = 0.46, P < 0.001), while no association in men (r = 0.18, P = 0.199). In female, a multivariate logistic regression identified HRR as the strongest negative predictor of impaired CFVR [HR (95% CI) = 0.854 (0.764-0.956), P = 0.006]. Based on the ROC curve, HRR < 35% was a strong indicator of impaired CFVR, with AUC of 0.838, sensitivity of 70%, and specificity of 87% in females. A blunted HRR was seen in patients with impaired CFVR, with a most pronounced effect being seen in female patients. The blunted HRR < 35% is intricately linked to impaired CFVR in women with ANOCA beyond the value of traditional risk factors, which could ultimately contribute to risk stratification of impaired CFVR in such patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34919164What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.