Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34919161›Full record

ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2022

Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy and validity of biparametric MRI and multiparametric MRI-based VI-RADS scoring in bladder cancer; is contrast material really necessary in detecting muscle invasion?

Serdar Aslan, Ismet Mirac Cakir, Ural Oguz, Tumay Bekci, Erhan Demirelli

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05783271 (Validity of Parametric MRI Using VIRAD Scoring in the Diagnosis of Cancer Bladder), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05783271 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Validity of Parametric MRI Using VIRAD Scoring in the Diagnosis of Cancer Bladder

TypeinterventionalSponsorAssiut UniversityRan2025 to 2026Enrolled58ConditionsBladder CancerArmsGadolinium
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Evaluating biparametric MRI for diagnosing muscle-invasive bladder cancer with variant urothelial histology: a multicenter study.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Serdar AslanDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Giresun University, Giresun, Turkey. serdaraslan28@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2950-8767
Ismet Mirac CakirDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Giresun University, Giresun, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4229-7493
Ural OguzDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Giresun University, Giresun, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0652-7957
Tumay BekciDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Giresun University, Giresun, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3147-2786
Erhan DemirelliDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Giresun University, Giresun, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0187-2156
Giresun University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose(1) To evaluate the accuracy and validity of the biparametric MRI (bp-MRI), including T2-weigthed image (WI) and DWI sequences, and the availability of an alternative to the multiparametric MRI (mp-MRI), for the muscle-invasiveness assessment of bladder cancer (BC). (2) To evaluate the diagnostic performance and agreement of readers with different experiences in the abdominal imaging of using both protocols.

methodsPreoperative bladder mp-MRI was performed on 128 patients with a initial diagnosis of BC. Two sets of images, set 1 (bp-MRI) and set 2 (mp-MRI), were independently evaluated by both readers. Descriptive statistics, including sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and area under the curve (AUC), for VI-RADS scores were calculated using ≥ 4 as the cutoff for muscle invasion for each reader and image sets. Inter-reader agreement was evaluated using the Cohen's kappa coefficient.

resultsThe sensitivity ranged between 90.3-93.5% and 87.1-90.3%, specificity ranged between 96.6-99.1% and 91.6-96.6%, accuracy ranged between 96-97.3% and 91.3-94.6%, and AUC ranged between 0.947-0.951 and 0.919-0.921, for bp-MRI and mp-MRI, and reader 1 and reader 2, respectively. No significant differences were shown in diagnostic performance for either reader between both the protocols (p = 0.238 and 0.318). There was excellent agreement among the readers in the VI-RADS scores, using both protocols.

conclusionA bp-MRI protocol has a diagnostic accuracy comparable to an mp-MRI protocol for the detection of muscle-invasive BC using the VI-RADS criteria. Also, in both MRI protocols, the reader's experience does not appear to significantly affect diagnostic performance when using the VI-RADS criteria.

Indexed as

Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance ImagingUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsContrast MediaHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMusclesRetrospective StudiesContrast MediaBladder cancerContrast mediaDiffusion magnetic resonance imagingMagnetic resonance imagingMuscleNeoplasm invasion

Identifiers

PMID34919161
OpenAlexW4200228770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.