Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34918997›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of international medical research2021

Analysis of safety and efficacy of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy in the treatment of left pancreatic malignant tumors.

Tang Hao, Jiang Shiming, Chen Yong

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of international medical research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tang HaoHepatobiliary Surgery, 117972The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5291-7521
Jiang ShimingHepatobiliary Surgery, 117972The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Chen YongHepatobiliary Surgery, 117972The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
The Affiliated Yongchuan Hospital of Chongqing Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDistal pancreatectomy is the most extensive operation to treat malignant tumors of the left pancreas; however, malignant pancreatic tumors are prone to early invasion and metastasis.

methodsThe clinical data of 80 patients undergoing surgical treatment for malignant tumors of the pancreatic body or tail from January 2013 to December 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. The main clinical variables were compared between patients undergoing laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) vs. open distal pancreatectomy (ODP).

resultsThere were no significant differences in general patient characteristics, complications, and postoperative survival (χ

conclusionLDP is a safe and feasible treatment for left pancreatic malignancies, with the same surgical efficacy as ODP. LDP also has the advantages of minimally invasive surgery, such as minimal trauma and enhanced recovery after surgery.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyPancreatic NeoplasmsHumansPancreatectomyRetrospective StudiesWalkingfast recoverylaparoscopic left pancreatectomyLeft pancreasminimally invasive surgerypancreatic neoplasmsafe and effective

Identifiers

PMID34918997
PMCPMC8728783
OpenAlexW4200586556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.