ArticleOral health & preventive dentistry2021
Chairside Diabetes Screening: A Survey of Dental Providers at the Largest Municipal Healthcare System in the United States.
Article in Oral health & preventive dentistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Metabolic Risk Signals in Periodontal Clinics: Cross-Sectional Associations of PISA with hs-CRP and HOMA-IR.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Developing a Multilayer Framework for Integrating Oral Health into General Health: A Scoping Review from Oral Healthcare Workers' Perspectives.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Attitudes and Practices of Dental Hygienists Regarding Diabetes Screening and Medical-Dental Collaboration: A Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study in Japan.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Gingival crevicular fluid levels of apelin correlates with clinical periodontal diagnosis.Clinical oral investigations · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo assess the knowledge and attitudes of dentists at the largest municipal healthcare system in the United States with regard to point-of-care chairside diabetes testing in the dental clinic. MATERIALS AND
methodsA 29-item survey was designed in a web-based platform (Survey Monkey) and distributed in November 2020 to 264 dental providers (attending dentists and residents) within eleven dental departments of the New York City Health + Hospitals municipal healthcare system. The questionnaire included sections on demographics, current practices, level of diabetes training, scope of practice, and attitudes regarding chairside diabetes testing. Descriptive statistics, bivariate analyses, and logistic regression analyses were performed, with statistical significance set at 0.05.
resultsDentists' willingness to provide chairside HbA1c screening was positively associated with their agreement that this was part of their role (OR = 7.2, p = 0.001) and that screening has an impact on diabetes control (OR = 4.3, p = 0.04). The two most commonly reported barriers to willingness to provide chairside HbA1c screening were amount of time required to obtain and discuss a patient's test results (82.3%) and lack of reimbursement (70.6%).
conclusionAmong the largest municipal healthcare systems in the US, there is very limited integration of diabetes screening and management in the dental setting. Given the epidemic of diabetes among the vulnerable population that these hospitals serve, the dental setting is a critical but underutilized site for diabetes screening and medical referral. Increased efforts should be directed towards implementing workflows that incorporate auxiliary dental staff in order to address barriers to chairside screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.