Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34918505›Full record

ArticleOral health & preventive dentistry2021

Progression of Enamel Demineralisation Around Fissure Sealants: Optical Coherence Tomography Study.

Alaa Turkistani, Turki A Bakhsh

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oral health & preventive dentistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alaa Turkistani
Turki A Bakhsh

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the progression of enamel demineralisation around fissure sealants using cross-polarisation optical coherence tomography (CP-OCT). MATERIALS AND

methodsThree fissure sealants; Fuji Triage (FJ, GC), Beautisealant (BT, Shofu) and Helioseal resin sealant (HL, Ivoclar Vivadent) were placed in cavities (3 × 0.5 × 1 mm) prepared in bovine enamel blocks (n = 5). After 7-day artificial saliva incubation, specimens were subjected to demineralisation for 4 weeks (pH 4.5). CP-OCT scans (Santec) were acquired for each specimen after 1, 2 and 4 weeks of demineralisation and lesions were quantitatively measured to analyse lesion progression.

resultsRepeated-measures ANOVA demonstrated that lesion size was statistically significantly affected by demineralisation period, fissure sealant type, and their interaction (P < 0.001). At 4 weeks, the highest mean value of lesion size was observed in HL group while FJ group showed the lowest. The rate of lesion progression was slower in FJ and statistically significantly different from BT (P < 0.05), which in turn was statistically significantly different than HL (P < 0.001).

conclusionFissure sealants that actively release ions are capable of improving the acid resistance of adjacent enamel. Beautisealant showed increased demineralisation inhibition compared to conventional resin sealant, but less than that provided by glass-ionomer sealant.

Indexed as

Dental CariesPit and Fissure SealantsAnimalsCattleDental EnamelHumansSaliva, ArtificialTomography, Optical CoherencePit and Fissure SealantsSaliva, Artificialenamelfissure sealantfluorideoptical coherence tomographytooth demineralisation

Identifiers

PMID34918505
PMCPMC11640772
OpenAlexW4206548735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.