Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34918488›Full record

ArticleThoracic cancer2022

Differential diagnosis of lung cancer and benign lung lesion using salivary metabolites: A preliminary study.

Satoshi Takamori, Shigeo Ishikawa, Jun Suzuki, Hiroyuki Oizumi, Tetsuro Uchida, Shohei Ueda, Kaoru Edamatsu, Mitsuyoshi Iino, Masahiro Sugimoto

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Thoracic cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Liquid biopsy techniques and lung cancer: diagnosis, monitoring and evaluation.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2024
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Satoshi TakamoriDepartment of Surgery II, Faculty of Medicine, Yamagata University, Yamagata, Japan.
Shigeo IshikawaDepartment of Dentistry, Oral and Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Yamagata University, Yamagata, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-1993-0860
Jun SuzukiDepartment of Surgery II, Faculty of Medicine, Yamagata University, Yamagata, Japan.
Hiroyuki OizumiDepartment of Surgery II, Faculty of Medicine, Yamagata University, Yamagata, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-5916-7460
Tetsuro UchidaDepartment of Surgery II, Faculty of Medicine, Yamagata University, Yamagata, Japan.
Shohei UedaDepartment of Dentistry, Oral and Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Yamagata University, Yamagata, Japan.
Kaoru EdamatsuDepartment of Dentistry, Oral and Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Yamagata University, Yamagata, Japan.
Mitsuyoshi IinoDepartment of Dentistry, Oral and Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Yamagata University, Yamagata, Japan.
Masahiro SugimotoHealth Promotion and Pre-Emptive Medicine, Research and Development Center for Minimally Invasive Therapies, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Yamagata University · JPTokyo Medical University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSaliva is often used as a biomarker for the diagnosis of some oral and systematic diseases, owing to the non-invasive attribute of the fluid. In this study, we aimed to identify salivary biomarkers for distinguishing lung cancer (LC) from benign lung lesion (BLL). MATERIALS AND

methodsUnstimulated saliva samples were collected from 41 patients with LC and 21 with BLL. Salivary metabolites were comprehensively analyzed using capillary electrophoresis mass spectrometry. To differentiate between patients with LCs and BLLs, the discriminatory ability of each biomarker was assessed. Furthermore, a multiple logistic regression (MLR) model was developed for evaluating discriminatory ability of each salivary metabolite.

resultsThe profiles of 10 salivary metabolites were remarkably different between the LC and BLL samples. Among them, the concentration of salivary tryptophan was significantly lower in the samples from patients with LC than in those from patients with BLL, and the area under the curve (AUC) for discriminating patients with LC from those with BLL was 0.663 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.516-0.810, p = 0.036). Furthermore, from the MLR model developed using these metabolites, diethanolamine, cytosine, lysine, and tyrosine, were selected using the back-selection regression method. The MLR model based on these four metabolites had a high discriminatory ability for patients with LC and those with BLL (AUC = 0.729, 95% CI = 0.598-0.861, p = 0.003).

conclusionThe four salivary metabolites can serve as potential non-invasive biomarkers for distinguishing LC from BLL.

Indexed as

Lung NeoplasmsSalivaBiomarkers, TumorDiagnosis, DifferentialHumansLungMass SpectrometryBiomarkers, Tumorbenign lung lesionlung cancermetabolitessaliva

Identifiers

PMID34918488
PMCPMC8807259
OpenAlexW4200246302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.