Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34918478›Full record

ArticleNursing open2022

Role of resilience in healthcare workers' distress and somatization during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study across Flanders, Belgium.

Erik Franck, Eva Goossens, Filip Haegdorens, Nina Geuens, Michael Portzky, Tinneke Tytens, Tinne Dilles, Katrien Beeckman, Olaf Timmermans, Stijn Slootmans and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Medical registrars at the University of the Free State: Burnout, resilience and coping strategies.South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Erik FranckFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Centre for Research and Innovation in Care (CRIC), University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-7809-2265
Eva GoossensFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Centre for Research and Innovation in Care (CRIC), University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium.
Filip HaegdorensFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Centre for Research and Innovation in Care (CRIC), University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium.
Nina GeuensFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Centre for Research and Innovation in Care (CRIC), University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium.
Michael PortzkyPsychiatric Centre Ghent-Sleidinge, Gent, Belgium.
Tinneke TytensFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Centre for Research and Innovation in Care (CRIC), University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium.
Tinne DillesFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Centre for Research and Innovation in Care (CRIC), University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium.
Katrien BeeckmanFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Centre for Research and Innovation in Care (CRIC), University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium.
Olaf TimmermansFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Centre for Research and Innovation in Care (CRIC), University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium.
Stijn SlootmansFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Centre for Research and Innovation in Care (CRIC), University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium.
Bart Van RompaeyFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Centre for Research and Innovation in Care (CRIC), University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium.
Peter Van BogaertFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Centre for Research and Innovation in Care (CRIC), University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium.
University of Antwerp · BEGhent University · BEVrije Universiteit Brussel · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo evaluate the impact and the possible role of psychological resilience in the COVID-19 pandemic outbreak on healthcare workers' mental and physical well-being in Belgium.

designThis cross-sectional, survey-based study enrolled 1376 healthcare workers across Belgium from 17 April 2020 to 24 April 2020.

methodsThe study sample consisted of direct care workers (nurses and doctors), supporting staff and management staff members. The main outcomes are resilience, distress and somatization.

resultsHigher educational level was associated with lower symptoms of distress and somatization. Physicians exhibited the lowest risk of experiencing heightened levels of distress and somatization. Controlling for confounding factors, higher levels of resilience were associated with a 12% reduced chance of increased distress levels and 5% lower chance of increased somatization levels. Our results suggest the potentially buffering role of mental resilience on those working on the frontline during the COVID-19 pandemic outbreak.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsBelgiumCross-Sectional StudiesHealth PersonnelHumansSARS-CoV-2COVID-19distresshealthcare workersmental wellbeingresiliencesomatization

Identifiers

PMID34918478
PMCPMC8859066
OpenAlexW4200481511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.