Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34918471›Full record

ArticleUnited European gastroenterology journal2022

Prevalence and clinical significance of clinically evident portal hypertension in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing transarterial chemoembolization.

Lukas Müller, Felix Hahn, Aline Mähringer-Kunz, Fabian Stoehr, Simon Johannes Gairing, Friedrich Foerster, Arndt Weinmann, Peter Robert Galle, Jens Mittler, Daniel Pinto Dos Santos and 6 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in United European gastroenterology journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05703750 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Impact of Clinical Evident Portal Hypertension on Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Transarterial Chemoembolization (CHANCE-CHESS 2301): A Multicenter Retrospective Study

TypeobservationalSponsorZhongda HospitalRan2023 to 2023Enrolled228ConditionsHepatocellular Carcinoma, Portal HypertensionArmsTACE ± Systemic therapy
NCT05704192 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Non-invasive CT-based Hepatic Venous Pressure Gradient Assessment for Predicting the Prognosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Transarterial Chemoembolization (CHANCE-CHESS 2302): A Multicenter Retrospective Study

TypeobservationalSponsorZhongda HospitalRan2023 to 2023Enrolled373ConditionsHepatocellular Carcinoma, Portal HypertensionArmsTACE ± Systemic therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. AI-assisted ascites volumetry for prognostic stratification in HCC treated with Atezolizumab/Bevacizumab.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Portal hypertension in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and immunotherapy: prognostic relevance of CT-morphologic estimates.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2023
    Article
  10. [Changes of intestinal wall barrier function and its correlation with susceptibility to infection in patients with cirrhotic portal hypertension].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lukas MüllerDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8626-4044
Felix HahnDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5122-9014
Aline Mähringer-KunzDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7082-3745
Fabian StoehrDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2797-6252
Simon Johannes GairingDepartment of Internal Medicine I, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3240-5152
Friedrich FoersterDepartment of Internal Medicine I, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3234-8891
Arndt WeinmannDepartment of Internal Medicine I, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Peter Robert GalleDepartment of Internal Medicine I, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Jens MittlerDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Daniel Pinto Dos SantosDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4785-6394
Michael Bernhard PittonDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5572-7763
Christoph DüberDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Uli FehrenbachDepartment of Radiology, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3622-3268
Timo Alexander AuerDepartment of Radiology, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5763-689X
Bernhard GebauerDepartment of Radiology, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9948-7220
Roman KloecknerDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5492-4792
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DECharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEUniversity Hospital Cologne · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinically evident portal hypertension (CEPH) was previously identified as a prognostic factor for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, little is known about the prognostic influence of CEPH on the long-term outcome of patients with HCC undergoing transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), particularly in Western populations.

objectivesThis study investigated the prevalence and prognostic influence of CEPH in a Western population of patients with HCC undergoing TACE.

methodsThis retrospective study included 349 treatment-naïve patients that received initial TACE treatment at our tertiary care center between January 2010 and November 2020. CEPH was defined as a combination of ascites, esophageal/gastric varices, splenomegaly and a low platelet count. We assessed the influence of CEPH and its defining factors on median overall survival (OS) in HCC patients. We compared the effects of CEPH to those of well-known prognostic factors.

resultsOf the 349 patients included, 304 (87.1%) patients had liver cirrhosis. CEPH was present in 241 (69.1%) patients. The median OS times were 10.6 months for patients with CEPH and 17.1 months for patients without CEPH (log rank p = 0.036). Median OS without a present surrogate was 17.1 months, while patients with one respectively more than two present CEPH surrogates had a median OS of 10.8 and 9.4 months (log rank p = 0.053). In multivariate analysis, CEPH was no significant risk factor for OS (p = 0.190). Of the CEPH-defining factors, only ascites reached significance in a univariate analysis.

conclusionCEPH was present in more than two thirds of the patients with HCC undergoing TACE in our cohort of Western patients. Patients with CEPH had a significantly impaired survival in univariate analysis. However, no significance was reached in multivariate analysis. Thus, when TACE treatment is deemed oncologically reasonable, patients should not be excluded from TACE treatment due to the presence of surrogates of portal hypertension alone.

Indexed as

AgedAnalysis of VarianceAscitesCarcinoma, HepatocellularChemoembolization, TherapeuticFemaleHumansHypertension, PortalLiver CirrhosisLiver NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedPrevalencePrognosisRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcomecirrhosisclinically evident portal hypertensionhepatocellular carcinomaliver cirrhosislong-term outcomesportal hypertensionprognosissurvivaltransarterial chemoembolisation

Identifiers

PMID34918471
PMCPMC8830270
OpenAlexW4200243565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.