Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34918315›Full record

ArticleGesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany))2022

[Health Literacy Among German Health Professionals-To-Be - Exploratory Pilot Study].

Anke Simon, Margrit Ebinger, Elisabeth Holoch

Open access · greenAbstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [Professional Health Literacy Among Midwives - Findings from a Standardised Online Survey Conducted in Bavaria].Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. [Professional health literacy. Professional and gender-specific aspects].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2025
    Article
  4. [Professional Health Literacy of General Practitioners - Results of the HLS-PROF].Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)) · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anke SimonFakultät Wirtschaft, Studienzentrum Gesundheitswissenschaften & Management, Duale Hochschule Baden-Württemberg Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Deutschland.ORCID 0000-0003-4325-269X
Margrit EbingerFakultät Wirtschaft, Studienzentrum Gesundheitswissenschaften & Management, Duale Hochschule Baden-Württemberg Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Deutschland.
Elisabeth HolochFakultät Wirtschaft, Studienzentrum Gesundheitswissenschaften & Management, Duale Hochschule Baden-Württemberg Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Deutschland.
Baden-Wuerttemberg Cooperative State University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveHealth literacy is defined as the ability to collect, understand, evaluate and use health information. Previous studies have shown that the German population has only an average level of health literacy. Health professionals such as nurses, doctors or midwives need to be health literate themselves to promote patients' health literacy, as well as to protect and promote their own health. So far, there is a lack of research about health literacy among health professionals in Germany. The objective of this study was to assess the health literacy of health professionals.

methodThe study involved 583 participants from the final year classes of the DHBW Stuttgart and dual cooperation partners (vocational schools and academic teaching hospitals). These included graduates of nursing, midwifery and therapy (physiotherapy/logo-/occupational therapy), as well as management in health care and medical students in their practical year. The questionnaire HLS-EU-Q16 was used to record health literacy. By means of 16 questions, the participants rated on a 4-point scale how easy or difficult it was for them to find, understand, assess and implement health-related information.

resultsThe study showed that only 30.1% of the participants had sufficient health literacy; 48.9% of the participants showed problematic health literacy, 21.0% inadequate health literacy. The analysis of the individual questions showed that, in almost all areas, paticipants reported more problems in finding, understanding, assessing and implementing health-related information than respondents in other European countries.

conclusionsThe present study shows that young health professionals have limited health literacy. Further research is needed to obtain a more comprehensive and differentiated picture of health literacy among health professionals. Health literacy skills and competencies should be systematically introduced in health professions-related study curricula, as well as in bedside training.

Indexed as

Health LiteracyGermanyHealth PersonnelHumansPilot ProjectsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID34918315
PMCPMC11248464
OpenAlexW4200231912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.