Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34918288›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2022

Processing and Analysis of Ascites.

Hannah M Micek, Molly J Carroll, Lisa Barroilhet, Pamela K Kreeger

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hannah M MicekDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Molly J CarrollDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Lisa BarroilhetDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
Pamela K KreegerDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA. kreeger@wisc.edu.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

The role of multi-cellular aggregates vs. individual tumor cells in metastasis of high-grade serous ovarian cancerR01CA240965 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI KREEGER, PAMELA K · 2020 to 2025
$2.7M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA240965
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The accumulation of peritoneal fluid, referred to as ascites, is common in ovarian cancer. This fluid is a complex mixture that may include cells as well as a diverse array of cytokines and growth factors. Here we describe a comprehensive method to process ascites to maximize data collection. The cellular fraction and fluid are first separated by centrifugation. The fluid can be frozen for later analysis of soluble factors or for use in in vitro experiments. The cellular fraction can be processed to analyze its composition or stored for future use.

Indexed as

AscitesAscitic FluidCytokinesFemaleHumansIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsOvarian NeoplasmsCytokinesIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsAggregatesAscitesOvarian cancer

Identifiers

PMID34918288
PMCPMC9675583
OpenAlexW4200268245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.