Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34918258›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2022

Bioinformatic Techniques for Vaccine Development: Epitope Prediction and Structural Vaccinology.

Peter McCaffrey

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Peter McCaffreyDepartment of Pathology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA. pemccaff@utmb.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Structural vaccinology involves characterizing the interactions between an antigen and antibodies or host immune receptors. Central to this is the task of epitope prediction, which involves describing the binding affinity and interactions of a given peptide typically to the major histocompatibility complex in the case of T-cells or to the antibodies in the case of B-cells. Several computational models exist for this purpose which we will review here. Generally, epitope predictions for MHC-I and MHC-II are substantially different tasks as well as epitope prediction for continuous versus discontinuous B-cell epitopes. Overall, these models suffer from overprediction of epitopes although general themes support both the use of neural networks as well as the incorporation of more abundant and more varied experimental annotation into model training as valuable in improving predictive performance.

Indexed as

VaccinesVaccinologyComputational BiologyEpitopes, B-LymphocyteEpitopes, T-LymphocyteProtein BindingEpitopes, B-LymphocyteEpitopes, T-LymphocyteVaccinesEpitope predictionNeural networkPosition-specific scoring matrixStructural vaccinology

Identifiers

PMID34918258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.