Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34918241›Full record

ReviewMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2022

An Update on "Reverse Vaccinology": The Pathway from Genomes and Epitope Predictions to Tailored, Recombinant Vaccines.

Marcin Michalik, Bardya Djahanschiri, Jack C Leo, Dirk Linke

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Marcin Michalik *Department of Biosciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Bardya Djahanschiri *Institute of Cell Biology and Neuroscience, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany.
Jack C LeoDepartment of Biosciences, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, UK.
Dirk LinkeDepartment of Biosciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway. dirk.linke@ibv.uio.no.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this chapter, we review the computational approaches that have led to a new generation of vaccines in recent years. There are many alternative routes to develop vaccines based on the concept of reverse vaccinology. They all follow the same basic principles-mining available genome and proteome information for antigen candidates, and recombinantly expressing them for vaccine production. Some of the same principles have been used successfully for cancer therapy approaches. In this review, we focus on infectious diseases, describing the general workflow from bioinformatic predictions of antigens and epitopes down to examples where such predictions have been used successfully for vaccine development.

Indexed as

GenomeVaccine DevelopmentVaccinesVaccinologyComputational BiologyEpitopesVaccines, SyntheticEpitopesVaccinesVaccines, SyntheticCore genomeEpitope predictionPeptide epitopesReverse vaccinologySurface proteinsVaccine design

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.