Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34918189›Full record

ArticleUnfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)2023

[Imaging after trauma in clinics and practice for children and adolescents : Part 1 of the results of a nationwide online survey of the Pediatric Traumatology Section of the German Trauma Society].

Klaus Dresing, Ralf Kraus, Francisco Fernandez, Peter Schmittenbecher, Kaya Dresing, Peter Strohm, Christopher Spering, Sektion Kindertraumatologie der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Unfallchirurgie

Open access · hybridAbstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Is cross-sectional imaging necessary for fractures of the distal lower leg in children and adolescents: results of a nationwide survey.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Klaus DresingKlinik für Unfallchirurgie, Orthopädie und Plastische Chirurgie, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37099, Göttingen, Deutschland. klaus.dresing@med.uni-goettingen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1149-8903
Ralf KrausKlinik für Unfallchirurgie und Orthopädie, Klinikum Bad Hersfeld, Bad Hersfeld, Deutschland.
Francisco FernandezKindertraumatologie, Klinikum Stuttgart Olgahospital, Stuttgart, Deutschland.
Peter SchmittenbecherKinderchirurgische Klinik, Städtisches Klinikum Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Deutschland.
Kaya DresingDarmstädter Kinderkliniken Prinzessin Margaret, Darmstadt, Deutschland.
Peter StrohmKlinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Klinikum Bamberg, Bamberg, Deutschland.
Christopher SperingKlinik für Unfallchirurgie, Orthopädie und Plastische Chirurgie, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37099, Göttingen, Deutschland.
Sektion Kindertraumatologie der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Unfallchirurgie
Klinikum Darmstadt · DEOlgahospital · DESozialstiftung Bamberg · DEStädtisches Klinikum Karlsruhe · DEUniversitätsmedizin Göttingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe indication for radiography should strictly follow the ALARA (as low as reasonably achievable) principle in pediatric and adolescent trauma patients. The effect of radiation on the growing sensitive tissue of these patients should not be disregarded. QUESTION: The Pediatric Traumatology Section (SKT) of the German Trauma Society (DGU) wanted to clarify how the principle is followed in trauma care.

methodsAn online survey was open for 10 weeks. Target groups were trauma surgeons, pediatric surgeons, general surgeons, and orthopedic surgeons.

resultsFrom Nov. 15, 2019, to Feb. 29, 2020, 788 physicians participated: branch office 20.56%, MVZ 4.31%, hospital 75.13%; resident 16.62%, senior 38.07%, chief 22.59%. By specialist qualification, the distribution was: 38.34% surgery, 33.16% trauma surgery, 36.66% special trauma surgery, 70.34% orthopedics and trauma surgery, 18.78% pediatric surgery. Frequency of contact with fractures in the above age group was reported as 37% < 10/month, 27% < 20/M, 36% > 20/M. About 52% always request radiographs in 2 planes after acute trauma. X-ray of the opposite side for unclear findings was rejected by 70%. 23% use sonography regularly in fracture diagnosis. In polytrauma children and adolescents, whole-body CT is never used in 18%, rarely in 50%, and standard in 14%. DISCUSSION: The analysis shows that there is no uniform radiological management of children and adolescents with fractures among the respondents.

conclusionComparing the results of the survey with the consensus findings of the SKT recently published in this journal, persuasion is still needed to change the use of radiography in primary diagnosis.

Indexed as

Fractures, BoneMultiple TraumaSurgeonsTraumatologyAdolescentChildHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesAdolescenceChildhoodGermany-wide surveyRadiation protectionX‑ray diagnostics after trauma

Identifiers

PMID34918189
PMCPMC9842554
OpenAlexW4200297893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.