Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34918181›Full record

Observational studyJournal of general internal medicine2022

The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Mental Health, Occupational Functioning, and Professional Retention Among Health Care Workers and First Responders.

Rebecca C Hendrickson, Roisín A Slevin, Katherine D Hoerster, Bernard P Chang, Ellen Sano, Catherine A McCall, Gillian R Monty, Ronald G Thomas, Murray A Raskind

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of general internal medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
22.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 98 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Exploring the Role of Indigenous Determinants of Health in the Resilience of Native Nations during COVID-19.American Indian and Alaska native mental health research (Online) · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Rebecca C HendricksonVISN 20 Northwest Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center (MIRECC), VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA. Rebecca.Hendrickson@va.gov.
Roisín A SlevinVISN 20 Northwest Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center (MIRECC), VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA.
Katherine D HoersterDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.
Bernard P ChangDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Ellen SanoDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Catherine A McCallDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.
Gillian R MontyHealth Services Research and Development, VA Puget Sound Healthcare System, Seattle, WA, USA.
Ronald G ThomasDepartment of Biostatistics, University of California, La Jola, CA, USA.
Murray A RaskindVISN 20 Northwest Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center (MIRECC), VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA.
Columbia University Irving Medical Center · USMental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Centers · USUniversity of Washington · USHealth Services Research & Development · USVA Puget Sound Health Care System · US

Funding

The Identification of Modifiable Emergency Department and Sleep Factors Contributing to Psychological and Cardiovascular Risk in CliniciansR01HL146911 · NHLBI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI CHANG, BERNARD P., SHECHTER, ARI · 2020 to 2024
$4.3M
Noradrenergic biomarkers in PTSD: precision medicine & mechanismsIK2CX001774 · VA · VA PUGET SOUND HEALTHCARE SYSTEM · PI HENDRICKSON, REBECCA CAPPEL · 2018 to 2023
–
CSRD VA IK2 CX001774Foundation for the National Institutes of Health HL R01 HL 146911Foundation for the National Institutes of Health R01 HL 141811NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL146911VA Clinical Sciences Research and Development IK2CX001774Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System (US) R&D Seed Grant
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has greatly affected front-line health care workers (HCW) and first responders (FR). The specific components of COVID-19 related occupational stressors (CROS) associated with psychiatric symptoms and reduced occupational functioning or retention remain poorly understood.

objectivesExamine the relationships between total and factored CROS, psychiatric symptoms, and occupational outcomes.

designObservational, self-report, single time-point online assessment.

participantsA total of 510 US HCW (N = 301) and FR (N = 200) with occupational duties affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: CROS were assessed using a custom 17-item questionnaire. Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, insomnia, and generalized anxiety symptoms were assessed using the PTSD Checklist-5 (PCL5), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ9), Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), and General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD7). Respondents' likelihood of leaving current field and occupational functioning were assessed with 2-item PROMIS subscales. Relationships were modeled using multivariable regression. Open-ended responses were coded using rapid template analysis.

resultsCROS total scores correlated significantly with all four psychiatric symptom domains (R's = .42-.53), likelihood of leaving one's current occupation (R = .18), and trouble doing usual work (R = .28), all p's < .001. Half of HCW indicated a decreased likelihood of staying in their current occupation as a result of the pandemic. CROS were fit to a 3-factor model consisting of risk, demoralization, and volume factors. All CROS factors were associated with psychiatric symptom burden, but demoralization was most prominently associated with psychiatric symptoms and negative occupational outcomes. Among psychiatric symptoms, PTSD symptoms were most strongly associated with negative occupational outcomes. Open-ended statements emphasized lack of protection and support, increased occupational demands, and emotional impact of work duties. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: These results demonstrate potentially treatable psychiatric symptoms in HCW and FR experiencing CROS, impacting both wellbeing and the health care system. Mitigating CROS, particularly by addressing factors driving demoralization, may improve HCW and FR mental health, occupational functioning, and retention.

Indexed as

COVID-19Emergency RespondersOccupational HealthAnxietyDepressionHealth PersonnelHumansOccupationsPandemicsSARS-CoV-2COVID-19InsomniaOccupational traumaProfessional retentionPTSD

Identifiers

PMID34918181
PMCPMC8675543
OpenAlexW4200270411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.