Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34918145›Full record

ArticleThe journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences2021

Ongoing Refinement and Innovation in the Data Collection Protocols of the Third Round of the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project.

Katie O'Doherty, Daniel Lawrence, Anna Wiencrot, Sara Walsh, Jennifer Satorius, Erin Burgess, Lauren Sedlak, Kriston Koepp, Stephen Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Transitioning an In-Person Survey of Older Adults to Multimode Data Collection.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Sensory Health Among Older Adults in the United States: A Neighborhood Context Approach.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Katie O'DohertyNORC at the University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Daniel LawrenceNORC at the University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Anna WiencrotNORC at the University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Sara WalshNORC at the University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Jennifer SatoriusNORC at the University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Erin BurgessNORC at the University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Lauren SedlakNORC at the University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Kriston KoeppNORC at the University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Stephen SmithNORC at the University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Funding

National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project: Round 5R01AG048511 · NIA · NATIONAL OPINION RESEARCH CENTER · PI LINDA J WAITE · 2014 to 2026
$49.5M
National Social Life, Health and Aging: Wave 4R01AG043538 · NIA · NATIONAL OPINION RESEARCH CENTER · PI LINDA J WAITE · 2013 to 2026
$42.7M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG043538NIA NIH HHS R01 AG048511NIH HHS R01 AG043538
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe third round (R3) of the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project, a nationally representative, longitudinal survey of community-residing older adults, consisted of 4,777 in-person interviews and 6,100 completed visits to households to identify newly eligible respondents. It revisited respondents from the first rounds (Cohort 1), born in the years 1920 through 1947, and added new respondents (Cohort 2) born in the years 1948 through 1965. Coresidential romantic partners of both cohorts were also eligible. Data collection included in-person questionnaires, up to 11 biomeasures, and a self-administered, postinterview paper questionnaire.

methodsQuestionnaire domains included social network and social support, elder mistreatment, physical health, cognitive function, romantic partners and sexuality, fertility and menopause, mental health, and employment and finances. Biomeasure collection included height, weight, waist circumference, blood pressure and heart rate, timed walk, balance, chair stands, smell, saliva passive drool in a tube (cortisol, dehydroepiandrosterone, estradiol, progesterone, testosterone), dried blood spots (C-reactive protein, Epstein-Barr virus antibodies, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, hemoglobin, glycosylated hemoglobin [HbA1c], total cholesterol), and accelerometry (sleep patterns and physical activity). A brief questionnaire also collected data on respondents who were deceased or in too poor health to participate.

resultsMeasures such as response and cooperation rates are provided to evaluate the design and implementation. DISCUSSION: This article describes innovation in the development and implementation of R3, the recruitment of a new cohort of respondents, and fidelity to prior rounds' study design and data collection procedures.

Indexed as

AgingHealth StatusMental HealthSocial NetworkingSocial SupportAgedAged, 80 and overClinical ProtocolsData CollectionFemaleHealth SurveysHumansIndependent LivingLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedAgingBiomeasuresHealthNSHAPSurvey

Identifiers

PMID34918145
PMCPMC8678441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.