Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34917876›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal. Case reports2021

A new iteration for the single-access large-bore technique during Impella supported complex and high-risk coronary intervention: a case report.

Marco Araco, Angelo Quagliana, Giovanni Pedrazzini, Marco Valgimigli

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal. Case reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Single-access percutaneous coronary intervention with IMPELLA CP support using a 16F sheath in refractory ventricular fibrillation: a case report.The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marco AracoCardiocentro Ticino Institute, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Interventional Cardiology Department, via Tesserete 48, 6900 Lugano, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9787-9864
Angelo QuaglianaCardiocentro Ticino Institute, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Interventional Cardiology Department, via Tesserete 48, 6900 Lugano, Switzerland.
Giovanni PedrazziniCardiocentro Ticino Institute, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Interventional Cardiology Department, via Tesserete 48, 6900 Lugano, Switzerland.
Marco ValgimigliCardiocentro Ticino Institute, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Interventional Cardiology Department, via Tesserete 48, 6900 Lugano, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4353-7110
Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundComplex and high-risk coronary intervention (CHIP-PCI) and PCI in cardiogenic shock complicating acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are increasingly performed under mechanical circulatory support-so-called protected PCI. Among the available options, Impella Cardiac Power (CP) heart pump (Abiomed) is percutaneously inserted over the femoral artery and typically requires a second arterial access to perform PCI, which further enhances the risk of vascular and bleeding complications. The single-access technique allows Impella CP placement and PCI performance through the same vascular access. When a 7 Fr system is desirable, only a long and entirely hydrophilic coated sheath has been previously used, which is not available in Europe. CASE SUMMARY: A 85-year-old patient admitted with non ST-elevation - acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS), severely reduced left ventricular function and three-vessel coronary artery disease underwent single-access CHIP-PCI under Impella CP support. After a failed attempt to insert a standard 7 Fr long femoral sheath alongside the Impella catheter, we successfully introduced a 7.5 Fr sheathless guiding catheter and delivered the planned percutaneous treatment with the benefits conferred by a 7 Fr-rather than 6-lumen catheter, without the need for an additional arterial access. DISCUSSION: This is, to the best of our knowledge, the first case of CHIP-PCI performed under Impella support utilizing the single-access technique with a 7.5 Fr sheathless guiding catheter. Beyond advantages of the single-access technique in sparing time and avoiding vascular complications associated with gaining a second arterial access, the lower outer diameter of the sheathless catheter compared with standard 7 Fr sheaths may allow improved limb perfusion and lower chance of interference with the Impella CP catheter.

Indexed as

Case reportCHIP-PCIImpella CPMechanical circulatory supportProtected PCISingle-access technique

Identifiers

PMID34917876
PMCPMC8669554
OpenAlexW3209839318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.