Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34917804›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2021

Measuring the impact and reach of informal educational videos on YouTube: The case of Scientific Animations Without Borders.

Julia Bello-Bravo, Jane Payumo, Barry Pittendrigh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Julia Bello-BravoAgricultural Sciences Education and Communication Department, Purdue University, 615 West State Street, West Lafayette, IN 47907, United States.
Jane PayumoAgBioResearch, Michigan State University, 446 W. Circle Drive, Room 109, East Lansing, MI 48824, United States.
Barry PittendrighDepartment of Entomology, Purdue University, 901 West State Street, West Lafayette, IN 47907, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Given the popularity, reach, and variable accessibility of online platforms as channels for informal education by higher-education institutions (HEIs), it becomes practically and theoretically important to better understand the factors that affect the impact and reach of any such Internet-delivered ICT informal learning. Accordingly, this study analysed viewer data from one informal, science animation educational channel on currently the most-watched online platform, YouTube, to measure characteristics affecting the videos' impact and reach. Results from the study identified the most watched videos on the channel-including survival gardening using drip irrigation, charcoal water filtration, and tuberculosis prevention-and characteristic demand, time, location, and volume of video access. While the basic findings reaffirm prior research measuring statistically significant correlations between user-activity and YouTube engagement metrics (including watch-time, view counts, likes, and subscribers), they also demonstrate the and ability to make such content broadly applicable across demographics and globally. Offering some measure of insights for boosting HEI participation in informal educational science animation and ICT learning practices using platforms like YouTube-especially around the topics of water, agriculture, food security, and improved health outcomes-the findings also point to where improved methods for reaching the intended recipients of informal education online are needed to best leverage the potential of such platforms.

Indexed as

Agriculture, health, & community well-beingAnalyticsGlobalInformal learningScience animationScience communicationYouTube

Identifiers

PMID34917804
PMCPMC8668831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.