ArticleHeliyon2021
Model optimization and performance evaluation of hand cranked music box base structure manufactured via 3D printing.
Article in Heliyon, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Surface roughness and dimension accuracy data from hybrid manufacturing process using PLA material.Data in brief · 2024Article
- Article
- Review
- Excellent Characteristics of Environmentally Friendly 3D-Printed Nasopharyngeal Swabs for Medical Sample Collection.Polymers · 2023Article
- Article
- Research on Adaptability Evaluation Method of Polymer by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Technology.Polymers · 2023Article
- The Energy Absorption Behavior of 3D-Printed Polymeric Octet-Truss Lattice Structures of Varying Strut Length and Radius.Polymers · 2023Article
- 3D-Printed Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Composites by Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM): Fiber Length and Fiber Implementation Techniques.Polymers · 2022Review
- Failure Prediction in 3D Printed Kevlar/Glass Fiber-Reinforced Nylon Structures with a Hole and Different Fiber Orientations.Polymers · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A sound produced from the music box could mesmerize music lovers. The complex mechanism that combined manual with semi-automatics movement creates the music box as a challenge for the manufacturer to innovate and optimize. This study focused on redesigning a hand-cranked music box's base structure using 3D printing and comparing the sound produced with the original model. It is shown that 3D printing can create a complex model with minimum material waste and good repeatability. After remodeling the music box's in a 3D CAD model, the prototype was built, and the tune played by each model was recorded and compared. The results showed that four improvements were made in the barrel mounting, crankshaft holder, crankshaft locker, and comb locker from the built four models. The sound analysis shows that the quality of sound can be improved by using the system's spacer. Furthermore, the finite element method and exact experiment results show that the loudest and best sound quality can be achieved using a 60° angle slope for the music box base structure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.