Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34917757›Full record

ReviewClinical mass spectrometry (Del Mar, Calif.)2019

Pathogen proteotyping: A rapidly developing application of mass spectrometry to address clinical concerns.

Lucia Grenga, Olivier Pible, Jean Armengaud

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical mass spectrometry (Del Mar, Calif.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Differentiation ofMicroorganisms · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Infection and Burn Injury.European burn journal · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lucia GrengaLaboratoire Innovations technologiques pour la Détection et le Diagnostic (Li2D), Service de Pharmacologie et Immunoanalyse (SPI), CEA, INRA, F-30207 Bagnols sur Cèze, France.
Olivier PibleLaboratoire Innovations technologiques pour la Détection et le Diagnostic (Li2D), Service de Pharmacologie et Immunoanalyse (SPI), CEA, INRA, F-30207 Bagnols sur Cèze, France.
Jean ArmengaudLaboratoire Innovations technologiques pour la Détection et le Diagnostic (Li2D), Service de Pharmacologie et Immunoanalyse (SPI), CEA, INRA, F-30207 Bagnols sur Cèze, France.
Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For the rapid and reliable differentiation of clinically-relevant bacterial species, mass spectrometry-based methods have emerged in recent years as valid alternatives to existing techniques. Mass profiles generated by whole-cell Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization-Time of Flight mass spectrometry have revolutionized microorganism identification and proven their potential for proteotyping at the species level. Indeed, the methodology has been widely deployed in clinical settings. However, the low resolution and dynamic range of the methodology has limited its capacity to distinguish between subspecies. This discrimination capacity is pivotal in cases where certain strains display virulence or antibiotic resistance, and for epidemiologic analyses. Moreover, sensitivity and specificity are both key parameters when attempting to discriminate between microorganisms present in complex multi-pathogenic samples. These two parameters are also essential to meet the growing interest in the characterization of microorganisms contained within even more complex samples, such as the human microbiome. Tandem mass spectrometry, with its high resolution, holds great potential for use in the real-time direct analysis of pathogens at the most relevant taxonomic rank in routine clinical practice. This review explores the numerous benefits and challenges of implementing advanced proteotyping methods, based on tandem mass spectrometry, in clinical laboratories. We provide an overview of the current applications and methodologies, while also discussing recent improvements and potential new approaches for typing, as well as their future applications.

Indexed as

FTICR, Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonanceMALDI-TOFMALDI-TOF, matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flightMass spectrometryMLST, multilocus sequence typingMS/MS, tandem mass spectrometryPathogen typingPFGE, pulsed-field gel electrophoresisProteotypingTandem mass spectrometry

Identifiers

PMID34917757
PMCPMC8669450
OpenAlexW2943101803

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.