Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34917694›Full record

ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2021

Triage of Persons With Tuberculosis Symptoms Using Artificial Intelligence-Based Chest Radiograph Interpretation: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

Ntwali Placide Nsengiyumva, Hamidah Hussain, Olivia Oxlade, Arman Majidulla, Ahsana Nazish, Aamir J Khan, Dick Menzies, Faiz Ahmad Khan, Kevin Schwartzman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards for Interventions That Use Artificial Intelligence (CHEERS-AI).Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. The rise of artificial intelligence reading of chest X-rays for enhanced TB diagnosis and elimination.The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ntwali Placide NsengiyumvaMcGill International Tuberculosis Centre, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada.
Hamidah HussainInteractive Research and Development Global, Singapore.
Olivia OxladeMcGill International Tuberculosis Centre, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada.
Arman MajidullaInteractive Research and Development Global, Singapore.
Ahsana NazishGhori Tuberculosis Clinic, Indus Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan.
Aamir J KhanInteractive Research and Development Global, Singapore.
Dick MenziesMcGill International Tuberculosis Centre, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada.
Faiz Ahmad KhanMcGill International Tuberculosis Centre, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada.
Kevin SchwartzmanMcGill International Tuberculosis Centre, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3354-1159

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn settings without access to rapid expert radiographic interpretation, artificial intelligence (AI)-based chest radiograph (CXR) analysis can triage persons presenting with possible tuberculosis (TB) symptoms, to identify those who require additional microbiological testing. However, there is limited evidence of the cost-effectiveness of this technology as a triage tool.

methodsA decision analysis model was developed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of triage strategies with AI-based CXR analysis for patients presenting with symptoms suggestive of pulmonary TB in Karachi, Pakistan. These strategies were compared to the current standard of care using microbiological testing with smear microscopy or GeneXpert, without prior triage. Positive triage CXRs were considered to improve referral success for microbiologic testing, from 91% to 100% for eligible persons. Software diagnostic accuracy was based on a prospective field study in Karachi. Other inputs were obtained from the Pakistan TB Program. The analysis was conducted from the healthcare provider perspective, and costs were expressed in 2020 US dollars.

resultsCompared to upfront smear microscopy for all persons with presumptive TB, triage strategies with AI-based CXR analysis were projected to lower costs by 19%, from $23233 per 1000 persons, and avert 3%-4% disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs), from 372 DALYs. Compared to upfront GeneXpert, AI-based triage strategies lowered projected costs by 37%, from $34346 and averted 4% additional DALYs, from 369 DALYs. Reinforced follow-up for persons with positive triage CXRs but negative microbiologic tests was particularly cost-effective.

conclusionsIn lower-resource settings, the addition of AI-based CXR triage before microbiologic testing for persons with possible TB symptoms can reduce costs, avert additional DALYs, and improve TB detection.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencechest radiographycost-effectivenessdeep learningtuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID34917694
PMCPMC8671604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.