Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34917689›Full record

ArticleRobotic surgery (Auckland)2021

Concurrent Inguinal Hernia Repair During Robot-Assisted Transperitoneal Radical Prostatectomy: Single Center Experience.

Fevzi Bedir, Mehmet Sefa Altay, Hüseyin Kocatürk, Banu Bedir, Nurullah Hamidi, Abdullah Erdem Canda

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Robotic surgery (Auckland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Fevzi BedirDepartment of Urology, Health Sciences University, Erzurum Regional Training and Research Hospital, Erzurum, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-0506-0777
Mehmet Sefa AltayDepartment of Urology, Private Buhara Hospital, Erzurum, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-5691-0666
Hüseyin KocatürkDepartment of Urology, Health Sciences University, Erzurum Regional Training and Research Hospital, Erzurum, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-7254-7692
Banu BedirDepartment of Public Health, Aziziye District Health Directorate, Erzurum, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-8342-5351
Nurullah HamidiDepartment of Urology, Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-6825-1813
Abdullah Erdem CandaDepartment of Urology, School of Medicine, Koç University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-5196-653X
Erzurum Regional Training and Research Hospital · TRKoç University · TRMinistry of Health · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate outcomes of concurrent inguinal hernia (IH) repair with mesh during transperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). MATERIAL AND

methodsData of 26 patients (31 procedures) undergoing IH repair concurrently with RARP between January 2017 and January 2020 were evaluated retrospectively. Patients' demographics, intraoperative and postoperative variables were recorded. Patients were assessed based on prostate-specific antigen recurrence, IH recurrence, mesh infection, seroma formation and groin pain quarterly in the first year, and every six month thereafter.

resultsThe median age was 64.5 years in our population. IH was detected preoperatively in 46.2% of patients (n = 12) and intraoperatively in 53.8% (n = 14). Twenty-one (80.8%) patients (11 of them had right IH and 10 of them had left IH) had unilateral hernias and 5 patients (19.2%) had bilateral hernias. Twenty-three (88.4%) IHs were direct, three (11.6%) were indirect. The median operative time and estimated blood loss were 192.5 (range: 140-250) min and 100 (range: 10-170) mL, respectively. The median duration of IH repair, time of drainage, length of hospitalization, and catheterization were 32.5 (range: 14-40) min. 2 (range: 2-6) days, 6 (range: 5-8) days and 7 (range: 5-7) days, respectively. No perioperative complication due to RARP or IH repair was observed. During a median follow-up time was 18 months, no scrotal hematoma, seroma formation or mesh infection was identified.

conclusionIH repair performed during the same session at RARP is a safe and applicable procedure.

Indexed as

herniamesh applicationprostate cancerrobotic surgery

Identifiers

PMID34917689
PMCPMC8666846
OpenAlexW4200191761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.