Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34917637›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2021

Measuring Cannulation Skills for Hemodialysis: Objective Versus Subjective Assessment.

Zhanhe Liu, Joe Bible, Lydia Petersen, Prabir Roy-Chaudhury, Judy Geissler, Deborah Brouwer-Maier, Ravikiran Singapogu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Cannulation Skill Assessment Using Functional Data Analysis.IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Simulator-Based Metrics for Quantifying Vascular Palpation Skill for Cannulation.IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Zhanhe LiuDepartment of Bioengineering, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, United States.
Joe BibleSchool of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, United States.
Lydia PetersenDepartment of Bioengineering, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, United States.
Prabir Roy-ChaudhuryUNC Kidney Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
Judy GeisslerWilliams S Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital, Madison, WI, United States.
Deborah Brouwer-MaierTransonic Systems, Ithaca, NY, United States.
Ravikiran SingapoguDepartment of Bioengineering, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, United States.
Clemson University · USTransonic Systems (United States) · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USWilliams (United States) · US

Funding

CanSim: A novel simulator for training cannulation skills in dialysis careK01DK111767 · NIDDK · CLEMSON UNIVERSITY · PI SINGAPOGU, RAVIKIRAN · 2016 to 2020
$660k
NIDDK NIH HHS K01 DK111767
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lack of cannulation skill during hemodialysis treatments results in poor clinical outcomes due to infiltration and other cannulation-related trauma. Unfortunately, training of patient care technicians and nurses, specifically on the "technical" aspects of cannulation, has traditionally not received much attention. Simulators have been successfully deployed in many medical specialties for assessment and training of clinical skills. However, simulators have not been as widely used in nursing, especially in the context of training clinical personnel in the dialysis unit. We designed a state-of-the-art simulator for quantifying skill for hemodialysis cannulation. In this study, 52 nurses and patient care technicians with varying levels of clinical experience performed 16 cannulations on the simulator with different fistula properties. We formulated a composite metric for objectively measuring overall success of cannulation and compared this metric with subjective assessment by experts. In addition, we examined if years of clinical experience correlated with objective and subjective scores for cannulation skill. Results indicated that, while subjective and objective metrics generally correlated with each other, the objective metric was more precise and better suited for quantifying cannulation skill. Further, the simulator-based objective metric provides several advantages over subjective ratings, including providing fine-grained assessment of skill, consistency in measurement unaffected by subjective biases, and basing assessment on a more complete evaluation of performance. Years of clinical experience, however, demonstrated little correlation with either method of skill assessment. The methods presented for cannulation skill assessment in this study, if widely applied, could result in improved cannulation skill among our PCTs and nurses, which could positively impact patient outcomes in a tangible way.

Indexed as

hemodialysis cannulationmedical simulatorobjective metricspatient careskill assessment

Identifiers

PMID34917637
PMCPMC8669158
OpenAlexW3216406998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.