ArticleFrontiers in public health2021
Readability and Comprehension of Printed Patient Education Materials.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Who Reviews the Rewrite? Separating Patient-Initiated and Institutionally Curated Large Language Model Simplification.JMIR AI · 2026Article
- User evaluation of AI- and human-generated responses in digital health communication: a paired survey study.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Understanding the small print: a 5-year review of readability in phase I trial information leaflets.Trials · 2026Article
- Evaluating the clinical safety of large language models in oral cancer-related patient communication: a repeated-prompt observational study.BMC oral health · 2026Observational
- Development and Psychometric Testing of an Infectious Disease Knowledge Questionnaire in a Convenience Sample.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Article
- Assessing the information quality of AI-generated patient educational materials for diabetes: a scoping review.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Analyzing accessibility and suitability of online Krabbe disease resources.Journal of community genetics · 2025Article
- A User-Centric Comprehension Assessment of Prescription Drug Package Inserts in China: A Cross-Sectional Study.Health science reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Readability of Informed Consent Forms for Medical and Surgical Clinical Procedures: A Systematic Review.Clinics and practice · 2025Review
- An infodemiologic review of internet resources on dental hypersensitivity: A quality and readability assessment.PloS one · 2025Article
- Evaluation of the Quality and Readability of Web-Based Information Regarding Foreign Bodies of the Ear, Nose, and Throat: Qualitative Content Analysis.JMIR formative research · 2024Article
- Leveraging Generative Artificial Intelligence Models in Patient Education on Inferior Vena Cava Filters.Clinics and practice · 2024Article
- Readability and Quality of Online Patient Education Materials Concerning Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.Cureus · 2024Article
- The Readability and Quality of Web-Based Patient Information on Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Quantitative Content Analysis.JMIR formative research · 2023Article
- Enhancing Patient Education on Cardiovascular Rehabilitation with Large Language Models.Missouri medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.