Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34917493›Full record

ArticleBiotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2021

Bioelectricity generation using long-term operated biocathode: RFLP based microbial diversity analysis.

S V Ramanaiah, Cristina M Cordas, Sara C Matias, M Venkateswar Reddy, Jorge Humberto Leitão, Luis P Fonseca

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Recovery of ammonium from domestic wastewater using microbial fuel cells.Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Anode Modification with FeInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  8. TheScientificWorldJournal · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

S V RamanaiahiBB - Institute for Bioengineering and Biosciences, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Avenida Rovisco Pais, Lisboa, 1049-001 Portugal.
Cristina M CordasLAQV- REQUIMTE, Department of Chemistry, NOVA School of Science and Technology, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Caparica, 2829-516, Portugal.
Sara C MatiasiBB - Institute for Bioengineering and Biosciences, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Avenida Rovisco Pais, Lisboa, 1049-001 Portugal.
M Venkateswar ReddyCenter for Biotechnology and Interdisciplinary Studies, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute,110 8th Street, Troy, NY 12180, USA.
Jorge Humberto LeitãoDepartment of Bioengineering, iBB-Institute for Bioengineering and Biosciences, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Avenida Rovisco Pais, Lisboa, 1049-001 Portugal.
Luis P FonsecaiBB - Institute for Bioengineering and Biosciences, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Avenida Rovisco Pais, Lisboa, 1049-001 Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the present work, power generation and substrate removal efficiencies of long-term operated microbial fuel cells, containing abiotic cathodes and biocathodes, were evaluated for 220 days. Among the two microbial fuel cell (MFC) types, the one containing biocathode showed higher power density (54 mW/m

Indexed as

BiocathodeCyclic voltammetryMicrobial fuel cellPolymerase chain reactionrestriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP)Wastewater treatment

Identifiers

PMID34917493
PMCPMC8666517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.