ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2022
Pilonidal sinus of breast, a case report with literature review.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPilonidal sinus (PNS) is an acquired inflammatory infection that mostly occurs in the sacrococcygeal region. This study aims to present a case of breast pilonidal sinus with a brief literature review. CASE PRESENTATION: A 31-year-old female presented with two painful right breast lumps for about one-month duration. Ultrasound (US) examination revealed heterogeneous areas with minimal inflammation at the right breast. There was also a nipple inversion, retro areolar duct dilatation, skin fistula, and reactive inflammatory level I axillary lymph nodes, suggesting inflammation/infection. Wide local excision was done. Histopathological examination revealed duct ectasia with a focus of sclerosing adenosis and a single hair shaft located in the breast tissue. DISCUSSION: Authors encourage surgical treatment (excision and primary closure) due to high recurrence risk after aspiration, medical treatment, and slow response of the abscess to antibiotic administration. Gender, family history, smoking, overweight, sinus size, poor hygiene, and surgical technique are among the risk factors that play a role in recurrence.
conclusionBreast PNS is a very rare and atypical variant of PNS that may occur due to nipple inversion, hormonal effect, poor hygiene, tight brassieres. Surgical treatment is the best option to reduce recurrence risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.