Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34917192›Full record

ArticleZdravstveno varstvo2021

Working Conditions and Satisfaction with Working Conditions among Slovenian Family Medicine Trainees: A Cross-sectional Study.

Klemen Pašić, Vojislav Ivetić

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Zdravstveno varstvo, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 79% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Klemen PašićUniversity of Maribor, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Family Medicine, Taborska ulica 8, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia.
Vojislav IvetićUniversity of Maribor, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Family Medicine, Taborska ulica 8, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia.
University of Maribor · SIVodovod-Kanalizacija (Slovenia) · SI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn order to achieve a high standard in training programmes for future family medicine specialists, it is essential to have good tutors with well-organised family medicine practices. Proper working conditions for young doctors are essential for their satisfaction and future professional development. The aim of our study was to check the current working conditions of family medicine trainees in the practical modular part of the training programme in Slovenia, and to determine their satisfaction with working conditions.

methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted. The data was collected through a questionnaire distributed to 105 family medicine trainees undergoing the practical modular part of their training programme.

resultsThe study showed that the following 7 out of 25 organisational and labour law factors are significantly associated with a trainee's general satisfaction with working conditions: the location where work with patients takes place, the privacy of the premises, the accessibility of the main tutor, a constant patient population, suitable places for rest, paid out-of-hours substitutions, and appropriate pay grade.

conclusionThe results we obtained can be used to address certain aspects of trainees' working conditions in Slovenia that need improvement. By determining which working conditions significantly affect a trainee's satisfaction, we have the opportunity to modify these conditions and thereby improve the training programme. This could result in a less stressful and more efficient residency programme.

Indexed as

family medicineprimary healthcaresatisfactiontraineesworking conditions

Identifiers

PMID34917192
PMCPMC8643115
OpenAlexW3207525294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.