ArticleTherapeutic advances in gastroenterology2021
The relationship between
Article in Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of Helicobacter pylori infection on gastric cancer, obesity and esophageal diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Pooled it
- Development and Evaluation of Non-Antibiotic Growth Promoters for Food Animals.Veterinary sciences · 2024Article
- Review
- Effects ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionWhether the incidence of reflux esophagitis (RE) increases after the eradication of
methodsThis was a retrospective cohort study with approval by the Ethics Committee. Patients who succeeded in
resultsA total of 185 cases (male:female = 104:81; mean age, 63.5 years; mean observation period, 6.4 years) were examined. The prevalence of RE before and after eradication was 1.6% (3/185) and 7.0% (13/185), respectively (
conclusionThe prevalence of RE increased a long time after eradication, even in patients who were taking an acid secretion inhibitor. The prevalence of RE was not related to the degree of atrophy or change in atrophy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.