Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34917082›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2021

Safety of African Swine Fever Vaccine Candidate Lv17/WB/Rie1 in Wild Boar: Overdose and Repeated Doses.

Jose A Barasona, Estefanía Cadenas-Fernández, Aleksandra Kosowska, Sandra Barroso-Arévalo, Belén Rivera, Rocío Sánchez, Néstor Porras, Carmina Gallardo, Jose M Sánchez-Vizcaíno

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Recent progress and major gaps in the vaccine development for African swine fever.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Frontiers in immunology · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Vaccines for African swine fever: an update.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jose A BarasonaVISAVET Health Surveillance Center, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Estefanía Cadenas-FernándezVISAVET Health Surveillance Center, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Aleksandra KosowskaVISAVET Health Surveillance Center, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Sandra Barroso-ArévaloVISAVET Health Surveillance Center, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Belén RiveraVISAVET Health Surveillance Center, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Rocío SánchezVISAVET Health Surveillance Center, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Néstor PorrasVISAVET Health Surveillance Center, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Carmina GallardoEuropean Union Reference Laboratory for ASF, Centro de Investigación en Sanidad Animal (CISA, INIA-CSIC), Madrid, Spain.
Jose M Sánchez-VizcaínoVISAVET Health Surveillance Center, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Universidad Complutense de Madrid · ESCentro de Investigación en Sanidad Animal

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

African swine fever (ASF) is a highly lethal infectious disease that affects domestic pigs and wild boar. Outbreaks of ASF have grown considerably in the last decade causing important economic consequences for the swine industry. Its control is hampered by the lack of an effective treatment or vaccine. In Europe, the wild boar is a key wild reservoir for ASF. The results of the oral vaccination trial of wild boar with Lv17/WB/Rie1 are hope for this problem. However, this vaccine candidate has certain safety concerns, since it is a naturally attenuated vaccine. Therefore, the current study aims to evaluate the safety of this vaccine candidate in terms of overdose (high dose) and repeated doses (revaccination) in wild boar. Low-dose orally vaccinated animals developed only a slight transient fever after vaccination and revaccination. This was also the case for most of the high-dose vaccinated wild boar, except for one of them which succumbed after revaccination. Although this fatality was related to hierarchical fights between animals, we consider that further studies are required for clarification. Considering these new results and the current epidemiological situation of ASF in wild boar, this vaccine prototype is a promising tool for the control of the disease in these wild populations, although further studies are needed.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAfrican Swine FeverAfrican Swine Fever VirusAnimalsAntibodies, ViralDrug OverdoseSus scrofaSwineViral VaccinesAntibodies, ViralViral VaccinesAfrican swine fevercontrol diseaseinfectious diseasesafety studiesvaccineviruswild boar

Identifiers

PMID34917082
PMCPMC8669561
OpenAlexW3215609204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.