ArticleInternational journal of women's health2021
Cyclosporine A to Treat Unexplained Recurrent Spontaneous Abortions: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Single-Center Trial.
Article in International journal of women's health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cyclosporine A for Recurrent Spontaneous Abortion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Association of thyroid autoimmunity and pregnancy outcomes in unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss women: a prospective cohort study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
- Role of Immune Inflammation in Recurrent Spontaneous Abortions.Journal of inflammation research · 2024Article
- Demystifying the impact of prenatal tobacco exposure on the placental immune microenvironment: Avoiding the tragedy of mending the fold after death.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2023Article
- Article
- Article
- Progesterone as an Anti-Inflammatory Drug and Immunomodulator: New Aspects in Hormonal Regulation of the Inflammation.Biomolecules · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe World Health Organization (WHO) has defined Unexplained Recurrent Spontaneous Abortion (URSA) as three and more consecutive miscarriages before the 20th week of gestation. To date, empiric therapy for patients with unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss (URPL) is not precise. Studies have shown that URSAs are associated with Th1/Th2 and Th17/Treg immune imbalances at the maternal-fetal interface. The immunosuppressant cyclosporine A (CsA) is widely used in patients with organ transplantation or autoimmune diseases, and it has a good safety profile in pregnant women. However, high-quality evidence for CsA treatment of URSAs is lacking. Our purpose with this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CsA for improving pregnancy outcomes in patients with URSAs and to explore the role of CsA in regulating the immune balance. METHODS/
designWe expect to officially initiate our study at the Taizhou People's Hospital in March 2022. We defined the live birth rate as the primary outcome, and the secondary outcomes include the rates of successful pregnancy, miscarriage, pregnancy complications, and adverse pregnancy outcomes, and newborn birth weights. Patients who meet URSA eligibility criteria will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio into either a study group receiving CsA 2 weeks after fertilization or a control group receiving placebo at 2 weeks after fertilization (the women in both groups will receive the relevant treatment for 6 months). In addition, we will collect peripheral blood samples of the participants before and after the treatments, and we will isolate mononuclear cells and measure cytokine levels (IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-2, IL-10, IL-6, IL-4) and Th1/Th2, Th17/Treg ratios. DISCUSSION: This is the first randomized controlled trial to evaluate the clinical and immunomodulatory effects of CsA on the pregnancy outcomes of women with URSA and our results will provide evidence to evaluate the use of CsA as a treatment for women with URSAs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.