ArticleNagoya journal of medical science2021
Poor local control of ulcerative T1 glottic cancer treated with 2.25-Gy per fraction radiotherapy.
Article in Nagoya journal of medical science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Tokai Study Group for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (TOSTRO) started managing T1 glottic cancer using 2.25 Gy/fraction radiotherapy in 2011. The aim was to evaluate the local control (LC) rate and toxicity with 2.25-Gy radiotherapy in clinical practice and identify prognostic factors.The eligibility criteria were T1 glottic squamous cell carcinoma patients with age ≥20 years, treated with 2.25 Gy/fraction without chemotherapy between 2011 and 2017. LC rates were evaluated based on age, performance status, sex, T-category, tumor type (ulcerative or non-ulcerative), presence of anterior commissure invasion, tumor size, X-ray beam energy, and overall treatment time. Acute and late adverse events were evaluated using CTCAE version 4.0. A total of 202 patients were enrolled. The median follow-up period was 34.2 months. The 2- and 4-year LC rates were 93.8% and 93.1%, respectively. There was a significant difference in the LC rate between non-ulcerative type and ulcerative type (95.2% vs. 74.1% at 2 years, 94.4% vs. 74.1% at 4 years;
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.