Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34916699›Full record

ArticleBeijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences2021

[Predicting prolonged length of intensive care unit stay

J Y Wu, Y Lin, K Lin, Y H Hu, G L Kong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

J Y WuDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Peking University School of Public Health, Beijing 100191, China.
Y LinDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Peking University School of Public Health, Beijing 100191, China.
K LinDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Peking University School of Public Health, Beijing 100191, China.
Y H HuDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Peking University School of Public Health, Beijing 100191, China.
G L KongAdvanced Institute of Information Technology, Peking University, Hangzhou 311200, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo construct length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay (LOS-ICU) prediction models for ICU patients, based on three machine learning models support vector machine (SVM), classification and regression tree (CART), and random forest (RF), and to compare the prediction perfor-mance of the three machine learning models with the customized simplified acute physiology score Ⅱ(SAPS-Ⅱ) model.

methodsWe used medical information mart for intensive care (MIMIC)-Ⅲ database for model development and validation. The primary outcome was prolonged LOS-ICU(pLOS-ICU), defined as longer than the third quartile of patients' LOS-ICU in the studied dataset. The recursive feature elimination method was used to do feature selection for three machine learning models. We utilized 5-fold cross validation to evaluate model prediction performance. The Brier value, area under the receiver operation characteristic curve (AUROC), and estimated calibration index (ECI) were used as perfor-mance measures. Performances of the four models were compared, and performance differences between the models were assessed using two-sided

resultsThe final cohort in our study consisted of 40 200 eligible ICU patients, of whom 23.7% were with pLOS-ICU. The proportion of the male patients was 57.6%, and the age of all the ICU patients was (61.9±16.5) years.Results showed that the three machine learning models outperformed the customized SAPS-Ⅱ model in terms of all the performance measures with statistical significance (

conclusionThe RF algorithm-based pLOS-ICU prediction model had a best prediction performance in this study. It lays a foundation for future application of the RF-based pLOS-ICU prediction model in ICU clinical practice.

Indexed as

Machine LearningResearch DesignAgedHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedIntensive care unitsLength of stayMachine learningRandom forestSimplified acute physiology score

Identifiers

PMID34916699
PMCPMC8695140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.