Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34916648›Full record

ArticleEvidence-based dentistry2021

Is remote monitoring a reliable method to assess compliance in clear aligner orthodontic treatment?

Soumya Narayani Thirumoorthy, Saumiya Gopal

Erratum issuedAbstract readComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Evidence-based dentistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Clear Aligner Therapy: Up to date review article.Journal of orthodontic science · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Soumya Narayani ThirumoorthyMaster of Dental Surgery, American Board of Orthodontics, SmileLife Orthodontics, Texas, USA.
Saumiya GopalMaster of Dental Surgery, Dream Dental Care, Kerala, India.
American Association of Orthodontists · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Data source and study design Retrospective cohort study using the data obtained from PlusDental - a Berlin-based health-tech companyCohort selection and data analysis Patients who completed clear aligner therapy (CAT) in 2019 were selected for this study. A digital-based app was utilised for analysing compliance among patients who underwent non-extraction orthodontic treatment with clear aligners. The sample included 2,644 adult orthodontic patients, three-fourths of them being women and one-fourth men. The primary outcome involved patient compliance, which was evaluated using a questionnaire in the app, completed by the patient. The questionnaire required patients to enter details about the aligner change date, daily wear time and pressure exerted by each aligner. The effect of variables including age, sex, previous orthodontic treatment and satisfaction with one's smile on compliance, were also analysed. Statistical analysis was performed using two-sided chi-square tests.Results Only 36% of the patient sample were fully compliant and poor compliance was exhibited by 25%. Authors observed that women were less compliant than men and patients with no prior orthodontic treatment were better compliant towards CAT. Also, patients treated with removable appliances exhibited better compliance among those who had a history of previous orthodontic treatment.Conclusions The authors concluded that non-compliant patients can be identified early, using their results as a guideline. This will help in timely intervention of addressing compliance issues during clear aligner orthodontic treatment.

Indexed as

Orthodontic Appliances, RemovableDental CareHumansPatient ComplianceResearch DesignRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID34916648
OpenAlexW4200447096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.