Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34916647›Full record

ArticleEvidence-based dentistry2021

3D printing for fostering better dental education.

Prabhat Kumar Chaudhari, Harnoor Dhillon, Kunaal Dhingra, Mohammad Khursheed Alam

Erratum issuedAbstract readComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Evidence-based dentistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Comparison of 3D-Printed Patient Model Versus Animal Cadaveric Model in Periodontal Surgery Block Course-What Is More Feasible for Beginners? A Pilot Study.European journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe · 2026
    Article
  5. Evaluation of a 3D-Printed Model as Complete Case Scenario in Undergraduate Dental Education-Diagnosis, Treatment Planning and Clinical Practice.European journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Prabhat Kumar ChaudhariAdditional Professor, Division of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Deformities, Centre for Dental Education and Research, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi-110029, India.
Harnoor DhillonJunior Research Fellow, Division of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Deformities, Centre for Dental Education and Research, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Kunaal DhingraAdditional Professor, Division of Periodontics, Centre for Dental Education and Research, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi-110029, India.
Mohammad Khursheed AlamProfessor, Orthodontic Department, College of Dentistry, Jouf University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences · INAl Jouf University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim This pilot study evaluated a novel method of teaching dental caries removal to overcome the drawbacks in using plastic teeth that neither simulate carious lesions nor emulate the hard tissues of the tooth.Methods This study evaluated the students' perception of a novel method of pre-clinical teaching of caries removal on 3D-printed teeth with a simulated carious lesion. The lesion was simulated by creating an area of low density within the printed tooth. The study also examined the variation in location and extent of cavity preparation by the participants using a heat map analysis. Students who were in their final year of graduation, in the same university of the researchers, prepared cavities on the 3D-printed teeth and answered a questionnaire on their perceived readiness for clinical practice with conventional teaching versus the 3D-printed teeth.Results Among the 14 participants, a majority stated that they had high levels of anxiety when treating their first carious lesion and that the 3D-printed teeth would have better prepared them to treat patients. More than half indicated that the 3D-printed teeth had a better haptic simulation of caries removal and would have reduced their stress/anxiety when treating their first caries patient. There was a wide variation in the perimeter and the surface area of the cavity preparations by the participants.Conclusion Teaching caries removal with 3D-printed teeth that emulate a carious lesion could help students gain confidence and make them feel better prepared to treat patients in clinics.

Indexed as

Dental CariesToothEducation, DentalHumansPilot ProjectsPrinting, Three-Dimensional

Identifiers

PMID34916647
OpenAlexW4200286793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.