Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34916644›Full record

ArticleEvidence-based dentistry2021

Do orthodontic fixed retainers guarantee the stability of dental alignment at the end of orthodontic treatment?

Ra'ed Al-Dboush, Eman Al-Zawawi, Tarek El-Bialy

Erratum issuedAbstract readComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Evidence-based dentistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ra'ed Al-DboushOrthodontic Department, Jordanian Royal Medical Services, Amman, Jordan.
Eman Al-ZawawiDental Department, Ministry of Health, Amman, Jordan.
Tarek El-BialyDivision of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
King Hussein Medical Center · JOMinistry of Health · JOUniversity of Alberta · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Data sources Electronic searches of studies on orthodontic retainers were conducted up to 12 February 2021 in four electronic databases including Scopus, Web of Science, Embase and PubMed. Only studies in English language were included.Study selection Only clinical studies were included. The inclusion and exclusion criteria were reported. The initial search identified 117 results. After removing duplicate studies, studies were evaluated against the inclusion criteria. Finally, 21 papers were included. Selection of the studies was performed independently by two reviewers. The included studies assessed the effects of the type of orthodontic wire or fibre splint, the material used to bond it to the teeth and the procedure for bonding on the failure rate of the fixed orthodontic retainers.Data extraction and synthesis Data extraction was performed independently by two reviewers. They followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines. The following items were extracted: authors, year, type of study, study objective, number of subjects, comparison made, outcome measured and results. Three tools were used to assess the risk of bias of the included studies including the revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (RoB 2), the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for case-control studies and the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Form for Cohort Studies. Meta-analysis was performed using the random-effects model.Results Twenty-one studies were included in the qualitative analysis while seven studies were included in the quantitative analysis. The included studies were three retrospective cohort studies, two case-controlled studies and 16 randomised clinical studies. The results showed that the failure rate of orthodontic fixed retainers ranged from 7.3% to 50%. Failure rates of fixed retainers placed in the maxilla were higher than those placed in the mandible. Previous failure increased the risk of repeat failure. Adhesive failure was considered the most common type of bond failure that was observed in fixed lingual retainers. The type of wire or splint has no effect on the failure rate. Results showed that retainers bonded to all teeth were more efficient in maintaining alignment when compared to retainers bonded on the teeth on the ends only. Indirect bonding techniques have no advantage over direct bonding techniques except for shorter chair time. Bonding fibre-reinforced composite retainers were more sensitive to operator skills, hence failure rates would be high if an incorrect technique was used when bonding.Conclusions No fixed retainer can guarantee the stability of alignment stability after orthodontic treatment. Retainers that are bonded to all teeth are preferable to those bonded only at the ends of the wire. Wires and fibre splints were similar regarding failure rates and stability of alignment.

Indexed as

Orthodontic Appliances, FixedOrthodontic RetainersHumansMandibleOrthodontic WiresRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID34916644
OpenAlexW4200594884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.