ArticleEvidence-based dentistry2021
What is the impact of primary dental avulsion injuries on the permanent dentition?
Article in Evidence-based dentistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Design Retrospective cohort study.Cohort selection Records of 2,922 patients, who attended a reference centre between 1998 and 2019 with primary dental trauma and who had radiographs and photographs, were screened to identify primary dental avulsion injuries that were followed-up until complete eruption of the permanent successors. 240 records were eligible and 194 fulfilled the inclusion criteria.Data analysis Exploratory descriptive analysis was carried out to map the occurrence and type of sequelae to the permanent tooth following primary avulsion, comparing this to the control group of permanent anterior teeth from the same children where the predecessor teeth had not suffered any type of dental trauma. Exploratory descriptive analysis was also used to link the age the primary avulsion occurred to the type of sequelae to permanent dentition. Multilevel Poisson regression analysis was performed and relative risk values and respective 95% confidence intervals were calculated to evaluate the association between avulsion and occurrence of sequelae. Confounders were included in the model to calculate their effect.Results Of the 194 patients included, there were 266 avulsed primary teeth and 115 of the permanent successors presenting with sequelae (43.2%), compared to 15.4% in the control group. Demarcated opacities were most common in both groups. Primary tooth avulsions occurring in children under two years old had a higher risk of sequelae to the permanent successor. There was also a higher risk of successor sequelae with avulsions of the lower arch compared to the upper and when three or more teeth were affected by the trauma compared to a single tooth. Avulsions in children over three years old had a lower risk of hypoplasia and those over four years old had a low risk of opacities to the successor.Conclusions Following avulsions of primary teeth, there is a higher risk of sequelae to the permanent successor in children younger than two years, where the lower jaw is involved and when multiple teeth are involved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.