Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34916546›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Direct pesticide exposure of insects in nature conservation areas in Germany.

Carsten A Brühl, Nikita Bakanov, Sebastian Köthe, Lisa Eichler, Martin Sorg, Thomas Hörren, Roland Mühlethaler, Gotthard Meinel, Gerlind U C Lehmann

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
22.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 147 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Pesticide Mixtures in Surface Waters of Two Protected Areas in Southwestern Germany.Bulletin of environmental contamination and toxicology · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Carsten A BrühlInstitute for Environmental Sciences Landau, University Koblenz Landau, Fortstraße 7, 76829, Landau, Germany. bruehl@uni-landau.de.
Nikita BakanovInstitute for Environmental Sciences Landau, University Koblenz Landau, Fortstraße 7, 76829, Landau, Germany.
Sebastian KötheNature and Biodiversity Conservation Union (NABU), Charitéstraße 3, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
Lisa EichlerLeibniz Institute of Ecological Urban and Regional Development (IOER), Weberplatz 1, 01217, Dresden, Germany.
Martin SorgEntomological Society Krefeld (EVK), Marktstraße 159, 47798, Krefeld, Germany.
Thomas HörrenEntomological Society Krefeld (EVK), Marktstraße 159, 47798, Krefeld, Germany.
Roland MühlethalerNature and Biodiversity Conservation Union (NABU), Charitéstraße 3, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
Gotthard MeinelLeibniz Institute of Ecological Urban and Regional Development (IOER), Weberplatz 1, 01217, Dresden, Germany.
Gerlind U C LehmannNature and Biodiversity Conservation Union (NABU), Charitéstraße 3, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DELeibniz Institute of Ecological Urban and Regional Development · DEUniversity of Koblenz and Landau · DENature And Biodiversity Conservation Union · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In Germany, the decline of insect biomass was observed in nature conservation areas in agricultural landscapes. One of the main causal factors discussed is the use of synthetic pesticides in conventional agriculture. In a Germany-wide field study, we collected flying insects using Malaise traps in nature conservation areas adjacent to agricultural land. We used a multi-component chemical trace element analysis to detect 92 common agricultural pesticides in ethanol from insect traps sampled in May and August 2020. In total, residues of 47 current use pesticides were detected, and insect samples were on average contaminated with 16.7 pesticides. Residues of the herbicides metolachlor-S, prosulfocarb and terbuthylazine, and the fungicides azoxystrobin and fluopyram were recorded at all sites. The neonicotinoid thiacloprid was detected in 16 of 21 nature conservation areas, most likely due to final use before an EU-wide ban. A change in residue mixture composition was noticeable due to higher herbicide use in spring and increasing fungicide applications in summer. The number of substances of recorded residues is related to the proportion of agricultural production area in a radius of 2000 m. Therefore, a drastic pesticide reduction in large buffers around nature conservation areas is necessary to avoid contamination of their insect fauna.

Indexed as

AgricultureConservation of Natural ResourcesInsectaPesticidesAnimalsEnvironmental MonitoringEnvironmental PollutionGermanyPesticide ResiduesSeasonsTrace ElementsPesticide ResiduesPesticidesTrace Elements

Identifiers

PMID34916546
PMCPMC8677746
OpenAlexW4200462351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.