Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34916335›Full record

ArticleSexually transmitted infections2022

Impacts of COVID-19 on sexual behaviour in Britain: findings from a large, quasi-representative survey (Natsal-COVID).

Catherine H Mercer, Soazig Clifton, Julie Riddell, Clare Tanton, Lily Freeman, Andrew J Copas, Emily Dema, Raquel Bosó Pérez, Jo Gibbs, Wendy Macdowall and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sexually transmitted infections, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Decreased chlamydia notifications in six European Union/European Economic Area countries and England, 2024.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The Role of Mutual Masturbation within Relationships: Associations with Sexual Satisfaction and Sexual Self-Esteem.International journal of sexual health : official journal of the World Association for Sexual Health · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. STIs during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Hungary: Gonorrhea as a Potential Indicator of Sexual Behavior.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Catherine H MercerInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK c.mercer@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-4220-5034
Soazig CliftonInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4171-0805
Julie RiddellMRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8084-4566
Clare TantonFaculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4612-1858
Lily FreemanInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.
Andrew J CopasInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8968-5963
Emily DemaInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7254-2023
Raquel Bosó PérezMRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7342-4566
Jo GibbsInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5696-0260
Wendy MacdowallFaculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5868-8336
Dee MenezesInstitute for Health Informatics, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1628-1228
Mary-Clare RidgeInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9621-4529
Chris BonellFaculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6253-6498
Pam SonnenbergInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1067-1583
Nigel FieldInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2825-6652
Kirstin R MitchellMRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4409-6601

Funding

Chief Scientist Office SPHSU18Department of HealthMedical Research Council MC_UU_00022/3Wellcome Trust 212931/Z/18/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPhysical restrictions imposed to combat COVID-19 dramatically altered sexual lifestyles but the specific impacts on sexual behaviour are still emerging. We investigated physical and virtual sexual activities, sexual frequency and satisfaction in the 4 months following lockdown in Britain in March 2020 and compared with pre-lockdown.

methodsWeighted analyses of web panel survey data collected July/August 2020 from a quota-based sample of 6654 people aged 18-59 years in Britain. Multivariable regression took account of participants' opportunity for partnered sex, gender and age, to examine their independent associations with perceived changes in sexual frequency and satisfaction.

resultsMost participants (86.7%) reported some form of sex following lockdown with physical activities more commonly reported than virtual activities (83.7% vs 52.6%). Altogether, 63.2% reported sex with someone ('partnered sex') since lockdown, three-quarters of whom were in steady cohabiting relationships. With decreasing relationship formality, partnered sex was less frequently reported, while masturbation, sex toy use and virtual activities were more frequently reported. Around half of all participants perceived no change in partnered sex frequency compared with the 3 months pre-lockdown, but this was only one-third among those not cohabiting, who were more likely to report increases in non-partnered activities than those cohabiting. Two-thirds of participants perceived no change in sexual satisfaction; declines were more common among those not cohabiting. Relationship informality and younger age were independently associated with perceiving change, often declines, in sexual frequency and satisfaction.

conclusionsOur quasi-representative study of the British population found a substantial minority reported significant shifts in sexual repertoires, frequency and satisfaction following the introduction of COVID-19 restrictions. However, these negative changes were perceived by some more than others; predominantly those not cohabiting and the young. As these groups are most likely to experience adverse sexual health, it is important to monitor behaviour as restrictions ease to understand the longer term consequences, including for health services.

Indexed as

COVID-19Communicable Disease ControlHumansSexual BehaviorSexual PartnersUnited KingdomCOVID-19sexual behavioursexual healthsexual partners

Identifiers

PMID34916335
PMCPMC8687784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.