Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34916306›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Efficacy of neoadjuvant hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in advanced high-grade serous ovarian cancer (the NHIPEC trial): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Miao-Fang Wu, Li-Juan Wang, Yan-Fang Ye, Chang-Hao Liu, Huai-Wu Lu, Ting-Ting Yao, Bing-Zhong Zhang, Qing Chen, Ji-Bin Li, Yong-Pai Peng and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Miao-Fang WuDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Li-Juan WangDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Yan-Fang YeClinical Research Design Division, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Chang-Hao LiuDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Huai-Wu LuDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Ting-Ting YaoDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Bing-Zhong ZhangDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Qing ChenDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Ji-Bin LiDepartment of Clinical Research, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7632-3648
Yong-Pai PengDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Hui ZhouDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Zhong-Qiu LinDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Jing LiDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China lijing228@mail.sysu.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0003-1361-7790
Sun Yat-sen University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is an important treatment option for patients with ovarian cancer. Although intravenous NACT can improve optimal resection rates and decrease surgical morbidity and mortality, these advantages do not translate into a survival benefit. Ovarian carcinoma is mainly confined to the peritoneal cavity, which makes it a potential target for hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Our previous study showed that HIPEC could be used in the neoadjuvant setting, which was named neoadjuvant HIPEC (NHIPEC). Since hyperthermia is an excellent chemosensitiser, we hypothesised that the combination of NHIPEC and intravenous NACT could show superior efficacy to intravenous NACT alone.

methodsThis study is a single-centre, open-label, randomised (1:1 allocation ratio) phase 2 trial. A total of 80 patients will be randomly assigned into an experimental group (NHIPEC+intravenous NACT) or a control group (intravenous NACT). Patients in the experimental group will receive NHIPEC following laparoscopic evaluation, and four tubes will be placed via the laparoscopic ports, which will be used to administer NHIPEC. Then, perfusion with docetaxel (60-75 mg/m ETHICS APPROVAL AND DISSEMINATION: This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital (approval number: 2020-ky-050). Results will be submitted to peer-reviewed journals and presented at national and international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR2000038173.

Indexed as

Hyperthermia, InducedOvarian NeoplasmsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsClinical Trials, Phase II as TopicCytoreduction Surgical ProceduresFemaleHumansHyperthermic Intraperitoneal ChemotherapyNeoadjuvant TherapyRandomized Controlled Trials as Topicchemotherapyclinical trialsgynaecological oncologyprotocols & guidelines

Identifiers

PMID34916306
PMCPMC8679100
OpenAlexW4200592611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.