Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34916081›Full record

ReviewHearing research2022

Outer hair cell driven reticular lamina mechanical distortion in living cochleae.

G Burwood, W X He, A Fridberger, T Y Ren, A L Nuttall

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Hearing research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

G BurwoodDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland OR, United States.
W X HeDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland OR, United States.
A FridbergerDepartment of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
T Y RenDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland OR, United States.
A L NuttallDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland OR, United States. Electronic address: nuttall@ohsu.edu.

Funding

The mechanical and ionic roles of cochlear fluids in hearing and hearing lossR01DC000141 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI REN, TIANYING · 1989 to 2025
$12.5M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC000141
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cochlear distortions afford researchers and clinicians a glimpse into the conditions and properties of inner ear signal processing mechanisms. Until recently, our examination of these distortions has been limited to measuring the vibration of the basilar membrane or recording acoustic distortion output in the ear canal. Despite its importance, the generation mechanism of cochlear distortion remains a substantial task to understand. The ability to measure the vibration of the reticular lamina in rodent models is a recent experimental advance. Surprising mechanical properties have been revealed. These properties merit both discussion in context with our current understanding of distortion, and appraisal of the significance of new interpretations of cochlear mechanics. This review focusses on some of the recent data from our research groups and discusses the implications of these data on our understanding of vocalization processing in the periphery, and their influence upon future experimental directions. This article is part of the Special Issue Outer hair cell Edited by Joseph Santos-Sacchi and Kumar Navaratnam.

Indexed as

CochleaHair Cells, Auditory, OuterAcoustic StimulationBasement MembraneBasilar MembraneVibration

Identifiers

PMID34916081
PMCPMC9170269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.